2006Unpublished venueRequires access

The New Jersey Department of Transportation's Evaluation of Scour Countermeasure Devices

Hani Nassif, Joseph P. Davis, Oguz Ertekin, Harry A Capers

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The main reason for loss of a bridge structure in New Jersey has consistently been due to scour. In 2003, the New Jersey Department of Transportation (NJDOT) had identified 181 State-owned and 297 non-State-owned bridges as scour critical. This number continues to grow as the State completes its scour analysis of the 3,596 bridges over waterways. To address this issue, has initiated several actions. First, has given specific guidance to designers on provision of scour countermeasures in its Design Manual to ensure that risk of damage to a new bridge due to a scour event is minimized. Second, it has prioritized its listing of scour critical bridges and initiated contracts to armor its most critical bridges against scour. Third, it undertook a study to evaluate systems for monitoring bridge scour detailed in recent research. Lastly, it initiated and is close to finalizing a Handbook of Scour Countermeasure Designs for NJDOT through research conducted by the City College of New York. It is anticipated that this last action will be completed by winter 2006-2007. This paper outlines the authors completed evaluation of Scour Countermeasure monitoring devices. National Cooperative Highway Program (NCHRP) Project 21-3 “Instrumentation for Measuring Scour at Bridge Piers and Abutments” designated system(s) for monitoring bridge scour. The 2 systems that showed promise in that research were identified as items of interest by NJDOT: 1) Magnetic Sliding Collar and 2) Sonar systems. Two bridge sites were chosen, and equipment and methods observed under closely controlled conditions. Continuous scour data monitoring was initiated. The accuracy of each system and effects of various parameters studied. This paper gives an overview of the evaluation of instrumentation recommended under NCHRP project 21-3.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The main reason for loss of a bridge structure in New Jersey has consistently been due to scour. In 2003, the New Jersey Department of Transportation (NJDOT) had identified 181 State-owned and 297 non-State-owned bridges as scour critical. This number continues to grow as the State completes its scour analysis of the 3,596 bridges over waterways. To address this issue, has initiated several actions. First, has given specific guidance to designers on provision of scour countermeasures in its Design Manual to ensure that risk of damage to a new bridge due to a scour event is minimized. Second, it has prioritized its listing of scour critical bridges and initiated contracts to armor its most critical bridges against scour. Third, it undertook a study to evaluate systems for monitoring bridge scour detailed in recent research. Lastly, it initiated and is close to finalizing a Handbook of Scour Countermeasure Designs for NJDOT through research conducted by the City College of New York. It is anticipated that this last action will be completed by winter 2006-2007. This paper outlines the authors completed evaluation of Scour Countermeasure monitoring devices. National Cooperative Highway Program (NCHRP) Project 21-3 “Instrumentation for Measuring Scour at Bridge Piers and Abutments” designated system(s) for monitoring bridge scour. The 2 systems that showed promise in that research were identified as items of interest by NJDOT: 1) Magnetic Sliding Collar and 2) Sonar systems. Two bridge sites were chosen, and equipment and methods observed under closely controlled conditions. Continuous scour data monitoring was initiated. The accuracy of each system and effects of various parameters studied. This paper gives an overview of the evaluation of instrumentation recommended under NCHRP project 21-3.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The main reason for loss of a bridge structure in New Jersey has consistently been due to scour. In 2003, the New Jersey Department of Transportation (NJDOT) had identified 181 State-owned and 297 non-State-owned bridges as scour critical. This number continues to grow as the State completes its scour analysis of the 3,596 bridges over waterways. To address this issue, has initiated several actions. First, has given specific guidance to designers on provision of scour countermeasures in its Design Manual to ensure that risk of damage to a new bridge due to a scour event is minimized. Second, it has prioritized its listing of scour critical bridges and initiated contracts to armor its most critical bridges against scour. Third, it undertook a study to evaluate systems for monitoring bridge scour detailed in recent research. Lastly, it initiated and is close to finalizing a Handbook of Scour Countermeasure Designs for NJDOT through research conducted by the City College of New York. It is anticipated that this last action will be completed by winter 2006-2007. This paper outlines the authors completed evaluation of Scour Countermeasure monitoring devices. National Cooperative Highway Program (NCHRP) Project 21-3 “Instrumentation for Measuring Scour at Bridge Piers and Abutments” designated system(s) for monitoring bridge scour. The 2 systems that showed promise in that research were identified as items of interest by NJDOT: 1) Magnetic Sliding Collar and 2) Sonar systems. Two bridge sites were chosen, and equipment and methods observed under closely controlled conditions. Continuous scour data monitoring was initiated. The accuracy of each system and effects of various parameters studied. This paper gives an overview of the evaluation of instrumentation recommended under NCHRP project 21-3.

Key concepts: Bridge scour, Bridge (graph theory), Countermeasure, Engineering, Riprap, Pier, Civil engineering, Megaproject

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The New Jersey Department of Transportation's Evaluation of Scour Countermeasure Devices — Research Paper | ScholarLens