2006Bridges Conversations in Global Politics and Public PolicyRequires access

Iowa's Proactive Approach to Bridge Scour Monitoring

David Claman, Dena M Gray-Fisher

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Scour, which is the result of the erosive action of flowing water excavating and carrying away material from the bed and banks of streams and from around the piers and abutments of bridges, is the most common cause of bridge failure. The structural instability and undermining caused by scouring are affected by factors such as channel and bridge geometry, floodplain characteristics, flow hydraulics, bed material, channel protection and stability, riprap placement, and ice formation and debris. Directing its attention to the scour problem, the Federal Highway Administration issued a Technical Advisory in 1988 and again in 1991, revisiting the National Bridge Inspection Standards to require evaluation of all bridges for susceptibility to damage resulting from scour. Of special concern were scour-critical bridges, or those bridges that could experience catastrophic failure or become structurally unstable as a result of excessive scour caused by a destructive flood event. Over the past 4 years, the Iowa Department of Transportation has devoted significant time to evaluating the bridges under its jurisdiction and assigning scour-classification codes to them. This article discusses the scour evaluation of Iowa's 2,100 waterway bridges, 180 of which have been classified as scour-critical, and the scheduled hydraulic and structural construction countermeasures being taken to prevent their catastrophic failure.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Scour, which is the result of the erosive action of flowing water excavating and carrying away material from the bed and banks of streams and from around the piers and abutments of bridges, is the most common cause of bridge failure. The structural instability and undermining caused by scouring are affected by factors such as channel and bridge geometry, floodplain characteristics, flow hydraulics, bed material, channel protection and stability, riprap placement, and ice formation and debris. Directing its attention to the scour problem, the Federal Highway Administration issued a Technical Advisory in 1988 and again in 1991, revisiting the National Bridge Inspection Standards to require evaluation of all bridges for susceptibility to damage resulting from scour. Of special concern were scour-critical bridges, or those bridges that could experience catastrophic failure or become structurally unstable as a result of excessive scour caused by a destructive flood event. Over the past 4 years, the Iowa Department of Transportation has devoted significant time to evaluating the bridges under its jurisdiction and assigning scour-classification codes to them. This article discusses the scour evaluation of Iowa's 2,100 waterway bridges, 180 of which have been classified as scour-critical, and the scheduled hydraulic and structural construction countermeasures being taken to prevent their catastrophic failure.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Scour, which is the result of the erosive action of flowing water excavating and carrying away material from the bed and banks of streams and from around the piers and abutments of bridges, is the most common cause of bridge failure. The structural instability and undermining caused by scouring are affected by factors such as channel and bridge geometry, floodplain characteristics, flow hydraulics, bed material, channel protection and stability, riprap placement, and ice formation and debris. Directing its attention to the scour problem, the Federal Highway Administration issued a Technical Advisory in 1988 and again in 1991, revisiting the National Bridge Inspection Standards to require evaluation of all bridges for susceptibility to damage resulting from scour. Of special concern were scour-critical bridges, or those bridges that could experience catastrophic failure or become structurally unstable as a result of excessive scour caused by a destructive flood event. Over the past 4 years, the Iowa Department of Transportation has devoted significant time to evaluating the bridges under its jurisdiction and assigning scour-classification codes to them. This article discusses the scour evaluation of Iowa's 2,100 waterway bridges, 180 of which have been classified as scour-critical, and the scheduled hydraulic and structural construction countermeasures being taken to prevent their catastrophic failure.

Key concepts: Riprap, Bridge scour, Pier, Bridge (graph theory), Hydraulics, Engineering, Flood myth, Channel (broadcasting)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Iowa's Proactive Approach to Bridge Scour Monitoring — Research Paper | ScholarLens