2012Unpublished venueRequires access

Technology assessment of spent nuclear fuel reprocessing

Maria Kajstad

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

An assessment of the status of reprocessing with PUREX process was made. The study was composed of three main tasks: 1) an evaluation of the nuclear fuel, its composition and characteristics before it is irradiated in a reactor and after, to answer the question why is reprocessing necessary for the fuel to be recycled; 2) an analysis of the technical potential, developments and difficulties of the PUREX process and 3) an evaluation of environmental aspects of the reprocessing. To carry out the tasks a literature study and analysis were conducted. The conclusions of the study are that: 1) after irradiation in a reactor, fissile material is still present in the spent nuclear fuel, but it needs to be separated from undesired products in order to be recycled; 2) long history of the PUREX process together with continuous development and optimisation resulted in a technically well-functioning process and 3) recycling of the nuclear fuel is beneficial energetically, but improvement in utilisation of uranium resource is moderate, with additional wastes of low radioactivity produced, large amount of which is released to the environment is a drawback. Technical and environmental aspects of the PUREX reprocessing are important but not the biggest issues; in reality it is rather economical aspect and political decision that are the motivating factors for choosing the reprocessing as a strategy for the nuclear fuel cycle.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

An assessment of the status of reprocessing with PUREX process was made. The study was composed of three main tasks: 1) an evaluation of the nuclear fuel, its composition and characteristics before it is irradiated in a reactor and after, to answer the question why is reprocessing necessary for the fuel to be recycled; 2) an analysis of the technical potential, developments and difficulties of the PUREX process and 3) an evaluation of environmental aspects of the reprocessing. To carry out the tasks a literature study and analysis were conducted. The conclusions of the study are that: 1) after irradiation in a reactor, fissile material is still present in the spent nuclear fuel, but it needs to be separated from undesired products in order to be recycled; 2) long history of the PUREX process together with continuous development and optimisation resulted in a technically well-functioning process and 3) recycling of the nuclear fuel is beneficial energetically, but improvement in utilisation of uranium resource is moderate, with additional wastes of low radioactivity produced, large amount of which is released to the environment is a drawback. Technical and environmental aspects of the PUREX reprocessing are important but not the biggest issues; in reality it is rather economical aspect and political decision that are the motivating factors for choosing the reprocessing as a strategy for the nuclear fuel cycle.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

An assessment of the status of reprocessing with PUREX process was made. The study was composed of three main tasks: 1) an evaluation of the nuclear fuel, its composition and characteristics before it is irradiated in a reactor and after, to answer the question why is reprocessing necessary for the fuel to be recycled; 2) an analysis of the technical potential, developments and difficulties of the PUREX process and 3) an evaluation of environmental aspects of the reprocessing. To carry out the tasks a literature study and analysis were conducted. The conclusions of the study are that: 1) after irradiation in a reactor, fissile material is still present in the spent nuclear fuel, but it needs to be separated from undesired products in order to be recycled; 2) long history of the PUREX process together with continuous development and optimisation resulted in a technically well-functioning process and 3) recycling of the nuclear fuel is beneficial energetically, but improvement in utilisation of uranium resource is moderate, with additional wastes of low radioactivity produced, large amount of which is released to the environment is a drawback. Technical and environmental aspects of the PUREX reprocessing are important but not the biggest issues; in reality it is rather economical aspect and political decision that are the motivating factors for choosing the reprocessing as a strategy for the nuclear fuel cycle.

Key concepts: PUREX, Spent nuclear fuel, Fissile material, Nuclear fuel cycle, Nuclear reprocessing, Nuclear fuel, Waste management, Plutonium

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Technology assessment of spent nuclear fuel reprocessing — Research Paper | ScholarLens