1981Unpublished venueRequires access

NONLINEAR AND NONCOMPENSATORY PERCEPTUAL FUNCTIONS OF EVALUATION AND CHOICE. IN: NEW HORIZONS IN TRAVEL-BEHAVIOR RESEARCH

Jens Foerster

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

This paper discusses the differences between current travel demand modeling practice and research in the areas of psychology, consumer behavior, and decision analysis. Suggested is that human perception is a nonlinear process; that a number of choice models quite unlike the multinominal logit have been developed and tested, often with a high degree of success; and that human decision processes are much more complex than those suggested by current travel demand theory. The paper also shows that a number of different methodologies and conceptual choice models seem to indicate that decision processes are much more complex than suggested by current directions in transportation research, and that further exploration of the process of decision making in travel choice could be a fruitful area of research.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper discusses the differences between current travel demand modeling practice and research in the areas of psychology, consumer behavior, and decision analysis. Suggested is that human perception is a nonlinear process; that a number of choice models quite unlike the multinominal logit have been developed and tested, often with a high degree of success; and that human decision processes are much more complex than those suggested by current travel demand theory. The paper also shows that a number of different methodologies and conceptual choice models seem to indicate that decision processes are much more complex than suggested by current directions in transportation research, and that further exploration of the process of decision making in travel choice could be a fruitful area of research.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper discusses the differences between current travel demand modeling practice and research in the areas of psychology, consumer behavior, and decision analysis. Suggested is that human perception is a nonlinear process; that a number of choice models quite unlike the multinominal logit have been developed and tested, often with a high degree of success; and that human decision processes are much more complex than those suggested by current travel demand theory. The paper also shows that a number of different methodologies and conceptual choice models seem to indicate that decision processes are much more complex than suggested by current directions in transportation research, and that further exploration of the process of decision making in travel choice could be a fruitful area of research.

Key concepts: Perception, Decision process, Process (computing), Logit, Management science, Travel behavior, Consumer behaviour, Operations research

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
NONLINEAR AND NONCOMPENSATORY PERCEPTUAL FUNCTIONS OF EVALUATION AND CHOICE. IN: NEW HORIZONS IN TRAVEL-BEHAVIOR RESEARCH — Research Paper | ScholarLens