2008•ITS InternationalRequires access

Counter Proposals: The Netherlands is in the Process of Carrying Out Extensive Research and Technology Trials Prior to Introducing a Per-Kilometre Road User Charging Scheme from 2011

Tim Strong

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In this article the author describes research aiding in planning for the implementation of a road user charging (RUC) scheme in the Netherlands that will be fully operational by 2016. The evaluation of various RUC instrumentations that could handle the 8.5 million affected vehicles took 32 system presentations from 24 different organizations. Of the eleven types of on-board units (OBU) examined, three vehicles were equipped with Inertial Navigation Systems (INS), Differential Global Positioning Systems (DGPS), and wheel-speed indicators and tested on seven different pre-scoped routes. The most accurate systems incorporated DGPS, as researchers had expected; however, it is noted that cost-benefit analyses must be conducted to determine a particular system’s pragmatic viability. Authors explain that they expect a non-DGPS GPS-type system will be the type of OBU deployed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this article the author describes research aiding in planning for the implementation of a road user charging (RUC) scheme in the Netherlands that will be fully operational by 2016. The evaluation of various RUC instrumentations that could handle the 8.5 million affected vehicles took 32 system presentations from 24 different organizations. Of the eleven types of on-board units (OBU) examined, three vehicles were equipped with Inertial Navigation Systems (INS), Differential Global Positioning Systems (DGPS), and wheel-speed indicators and tested on seven different pre-scoped routes. The most accurate systems incorporated DGPS, as researchers had expected; however, it is noted that cost-benefit analyses must be conducted to determine a particular system’s pragmatic viability. Authors explain that they expect a non-DGPS GPS-type system will be the type of OBU deployed.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this article the author describes research aiding in planning for the implementation of a road user charging (RUC) scheme in the Netherlands that will be fully operational by 2016. The evaluation of various RUC instrumentations that could handle the 8.5 million affected vehicles took 32 system presentations from 24 different organizations. Of the eleven types of on-board units (OBU) examined, three vehicles were equipped with Inertial Navigation Systems (INS), Differential Global Positioning Systems (DGPS), and wheel-speed indicators and tested on seven different pre-scoped routes. The most accurate systems incorporated DGPS, as researchers had expected; however, it is noted that cost-benefit analyses must be conducted to determine a particular system’s pragmatic viability. Authors explain that they expect a non-DGPS GPS-type system will be the type of OBU deployed.

Key concepts: Global Positioning System, Scheme (mathematics), Differential GPS, Process (computing), Computer science, Kilometer, Transport engineering, Plan (archaeology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Counter Proposals: The Netherlands is in the Process of Carrying Out Extensive Research and Technology Trials Prior to Introducing a Per-Kilometre Road User Charging Scheme from 2011 — Research Paper | ScholarLens