1972Unpublished venueRequires access

AN APPRAISAL OF URBAN PLANNING

LYNNE M. LAMM

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

A GENERALIZED VIEW OF THE URBAN TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS IS PRESENTED. THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION (FHWA) STEWARDSHIP OF THE URBAN TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS IS REVIEWED. THE CREATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE URBAN PLANNING DIVISION, FEDERAL LEGISLATION, AND THE CHANGING DEMANDS OF THE PLANNING PROCESS WHICH LED TO THE INITIATION BY THE FHWA OF A PROCEDURE FOR ANNUAL CERTIFICATION OF THE ADEQUACY OF THE PLANNING PROCESS AS A PREREQUISITE FOR CONTINUED HIGHWAY PROJECT APPROVALS IN URBAN AREAS IS DISCUSSED. THIS CERTIFICATION PROCESS WHICH IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF FIELD OFFICERS HAS LED TO IDENTIFICATION OF MANY PROBLEMS AND TO THE CORRECTION OF FLAWS BY STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS. IN REVIEWING THE CURRENT STATUS OF URBAN TRANSPORTATION PLANNING, LOCAL/STATE ORGANIZATION, PUBLIC PARTICIPATION, SYSTEM PLANNING AND PROJECT PLANNING, EVALUATION OF NON- ENGINEERING CONSEQUENCES, AND THE PROPER SCOPE OF PLANNING ARE OUTLINED. GOALS SET BY THE INTERMODAL PLANNING GROUPS FOR THE NEXT YEAR ARE LISTED.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A GENERALIZED VIEW OF THE URBAN TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS IS PRESENTED. THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION (FHWA) STEWARDSHIP OF THE URBAN TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS IS REVIEWED. THE CREATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE URBAN PLANNING DIVISION, FEDERAL LEGISLATION, AND THE CHANGING DEMANDS OF THE PLANNING PROCESS WHICH LED TO THE INITIATION BY THE FHWA OF A PROCEDURE FOR ANNUAL CERTIFICATION OF THE ADEQUACY OF THE PLANNING PROCESS AS A PREREQUISITE FOR CONTINUED HIGHWAY PROJECT APPROVALS IN URBAN AREAS IS DISCUSSED. THIS CERTIFICATION PROCESS WHICH IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF FIELD OFFICERS HAS LED TO IDENTIFICATION OF MANY PROBLEMS AND TO THE CORRECTION OF FLAWS BY STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS. IN REVIEWING THE CURRENT STATUS OF URBAN TRANSPORTATION PLANNING, LOCAL/STATE ORGANIZATION, PUBLIC PARTICIPATION, SYSTEM PLANNING AND PROJECT PLANNING, EVALUATION OF NON- ENGINEERING CONSEQUENCES, AND THE PROPER SCOPE OF PLANNING ARE OUTLINED. GOALS SET BY THE INTERMODAL PLANNING GROUPS FOR THE NEXT YEAR ARE LISTED.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A GENERALIZED VIEW OF THE URBAN TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS IS PRESENTED. THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION (FHWA) STEWARDSHIP OF THE URBAN TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS IS REVIEWED. THE CREATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE URBAN PLANNING DIVISION, FEDERAL LEGISLATION, AND THE CHANGING DEMANDS OF THE PLANNING PROCESS WHICH LED TO THE INITIATION BY THE FHWA OF A PROCEDURE FOR ANNUAL CERTIFICATION OF THE ADEQUACY OF THE PLANNING PROCESS AS A PREREQUISITE FOR CONTINUED HIGHWAY PROJECT APPROVALS IN URBAN AREAS IS DISCUSSED. THIS CERTIFICATION PROCESS WHICH IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF FIELD OFFICERS HAS LED TO IDENTIFICATION OF MANY PROBLEMS AND TO THE CORRECTION OF FLAWS BY STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS. IN REVIEWING THE CURRENT STATUS OF URBAN TRANSPORTATION PLANNING, LOCAL/STATE ORGANIZATION, PUBLIC PARTICIPATION, SYSTEM PLANNING AND PROJECT PLANNING, EVALUATION OF NON- ENGINEERING CONSEQUENCES, AND THE PROPER SCOPE OF PLANNING ARE OUTLINED. GOALS SET BY THE INTERMODAL PLANNING GROUPS FOR THE NEXT YEAR ARE LISTED.

Key concepts: Transportation planning, Certification, Urban planning, Scope (computer science), Legislation, Process (computing), Land-use planning, Environmental planning

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
AN APPRAISAL OF URBAN PLANNING — Research Paper | ScholarLens