1998•ENRRequires access

CONTENTIOUS BAY SPAN APPROVED

D B Rosenbaum

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Despite protests by seven Bay Area mayors, an Oakland-based regional commission June 24, 1998, approved controversial design plans for replacement of the seismically rickety half of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge. Contractors are now angling for piece of the estimated $1.5-billion project, which involves replacement of 2.2-mi (3.5-km) stretch of Interstate 80 where 50-ft (15-m) section of the upper bridge deck dropped during an earthquake in 1989. Among the technical challenges contractors must ponder is how to hammer 8-ft-dia (2.4-m) tubular steel piles 300 ft (91 m) through mud and clay into dense sand. In mid-bay near Yerba Buena Island, the route will rise up to what would be the world's largest self-anchored single-tower suspension bridge. Anchored in the 0.35-mi (0.56-km) twin bridge decks, the cables will drape from 530-ft-high (162-m) tower founded on abruptly sloping rock. Critics say the engineers short-changed the viaduct design; others like what one adviser describes as a simple and elegant line of white.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Despite protests by seven Bay Area mayors, an Oakland-based regional commission June 24, 1998, approved controversial design plans for replacement of the seismically rickety half of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge. Contractors are now angling for piece of the estimated $1.5-billion project, which involves replacement of 2.2-mi (3.5-km) stretch of Interstate 80 where 50-ft (15-m) section of the upper bridge deck dropped during an earthquake in 1989. Among the technical challenges contractors must ponder is how to hammer 8-ft-dia (2.4-m) tubular steel piles 300 ft (91 m) through mud and clay into dense sand. In mid-bay near Yerba Buena Island, the route will rise up to what would be the world's largest self-anchored single-tower suspension bridge. Anchored in the 0.35-mi (0.56-km) twin bridge decks, the cables will drape from 530-ft-high (162-m) tower founded on abruptly sloping rock. Critics say the engineers short-changed the viaduct design; others like what one adviser describes as a simple and elegant line of white.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Despite protests by seven Bay Area mayors, an Oakland-based regional commission June 24, 1998, approved controversial design plans for replacement of the seismically rickety half of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge. Contractors are now angling for piece of the estimated $1.5-billion project, which involves replacement of 2.2-mi (3.5-km) stretch of Interstate 80 where 50-ft (15-m) section of the upper bridge deck dropped during an earthquake in 1989. Among the technical challenges contractors must ponder is how to hammer 8-ft-dia (2.4-m) tubular steel piles 300 ft (91 m) through mud and clay into dense sand. In mid-bay near Yerba Buena Island, the route will rise up to what would be the world's largest self-anchored single-tower suspension bridge. Anchored in the 0.35-mi (0.56-km) twin bridge decks, the cables will drape from 530-ft-high (162-m) tower founded on abruptly sloping rock. Critics say the engineers short-changed the viaduct design; others like what one adviser describes as a simple and elegant line of white.

Key concepts: Bay, Bridge (graph theory), Span (engineering), Tower, Deck, Engineering, Geology, Hammer

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
CONTENTIOUS BAY SPAN APPROVED — Research Paper | ScholarLens