1979Unpublished venueRequires access

APTA'S CONFERENCE SERIES ON TSM: OBSERVATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS

Daun Lee

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Although Transportation Systems Management (TSM) has evolved in many directions and exhibits a great variety from city to city and region to region, it is a healthy vital process in many communities. Many factors account for this evolution and for its success or failure. Goal conflicts and frustration of the local TSM process result from the fundamentally different perspectives on TSM taken by various federal agencies. The need for effective leadership of TSM programming and implementation may be thwarted by basic institutional or poitical factors, or by the mounting paperwork which divert the attention of regional planning agencies. The linkage originally envisioned between TSM as a planning process and the transportation improvement program as a program document may also be weakened by the emphasis on federally funded procedures projects and the dichotomy betwen UMTA and FHWA procedures. TSM reflects the variety of strategies and tactical approaches that have created not one but many TSM processes.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Although Transportation Systems Management (TSM) has evolved in many directions and exhibits a great variety from city to city and region to region, it is a healthy vital process in many communities. Many factors account for this evolution and for its success or failure. Goal conflicts and frustration of the local TSM process result from the fundamentally different perspectives on TSM taken by various federal agencies. The need for effective leadership of TSM programming and implementation may be thwarted by basic institutional or poitical factors, or by the mounting paperwork which divert the attention of regional planning agencies. The linkage originally envisioned between TSM as a planning process and the transportation improvement program as a program document may also be weakened by the emphasis on federally funded procedures projects and the dichotomy betwen UMTA and FHWA procedures. TSM reflects the variety of strategies and tactical approaches that have created not one but many TSM processes.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Although Transportation Systems Management (TSM) has evolved in many directions and exhibits a great variety from city to city and region to region, it is a healthy vital process in many communities. Many factors account for this evolution and for its success or failure. Goal conflicts and frustration of the local TSM process result from the fundamentally different perspectives on TSM taken by various federal agencies. The need for effective leadership of TSM programming and implementation may be thwarted by basic institutional or poitical factors, or by the mounting paperwork which divert the attention of regional planning agencies. The linkage originally envisioned between TSM as a planning process and the transportation improvement program as a program document may also be weakened by the emphasis on federally funded procedures projects and the dichotomy betwen UMTA and FHWA procedures. TSM reflects the variety of strategies and tactical approaches that have created not one but many TSM processes.

Key concepts: Variety (cybernetics), Process (computing), Process management, Computer science, Business, Political science, Operations research, Management science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
APTA'S CONFERENCE SERIES ON TSM: OBSERVATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS — Research Paper | ScholarLens