2002Unpublished venueRequires access

A PROPOSED BRIDGE SEISMIC DESIGN PHILOSOPHY AND CRITERIA (ABSTRACT ONLY)

B Maroney, N M Bobb

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Since the Loma Prieta Earthquake and the report to the Governor on that earthquake, Competing Against Time, significant attention has been focused upon bridge post-earthquake performance. Seismic design criteria continue to evolve with each new major project in California, to such a degree that consistency can be difficult to identify. This paper offers an accumulation of the California perspective of those experiences and the lessons learned. This experience is not only field experience, but actual project development experience as well, including interaction with reviewing entities external to project teams. Specific reference to experiences developing minimum seismic performance (e.g., standard bridges) and lifeline performance (e.g., San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge) criteria are documented. The authors offer seismic design/retrofit philosophy and performance criteria that are essentially the product of their experiences since the Whittier Earthquake of 1987.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Since the Loma Prieta Earthquake and the report to the Governor on that earthquake, Competing Against Time, significant attention has been focused upon bridge post-earthquake performance. Seismic design criteria continue to evolve with each new major project in California, to such a degree that consistency can be difficult to identify. This paper offers an accumulation of the California perspective of those experiences and the lessons learned. This experience is not only field experience, but actual project development experience as well, including interaction with reviewing entities external to project teams. Specific reference to experiences developing minimum seismic performance (e.g., standard bridges) and lifeline performance (e.g., San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge) criteria are documented. The authors offer seismic design/retrofit philosophy and performance criteria that are essentially the product of their experiences since the Whittier Earthquake of 1987.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Since the Loma Prieta Earthquake and the report to the Governor on that earthquake, Competing Against Time, significant attention has been focused upon bridge post-earthquake performance. Seismic design criteria continue to evolve with each new major project in California, to such a degree that consistency can be difficult to identify. This paper offers an accumulation of the California perspective of those experiences and the lessons learned. This experience is not only field experience, but actual project development experience as well, including interaction with reviewing entities external to project teams. Specific reference to experiences developing minimum seismic performance (e.g., standard bridges) and lifeline performance (e.g., San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge) criteria are documented. The authors offer seismic design/retrofit philosophy and performance criteria that are essentially the product of their experiences since the Whittier Earthquake of 1987.

Key concepts: Bridge (graph theory), Consistency (knowledge bases), Philosophy of design, Seismic analysis, Engineering, Seismic retrofit, Civil engineering, Forensic engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A PROPOSED BRIDGE SEISMIC DESIGN PHILOSOPHY AND CRITERIA (ABSTRACT ONLY) — Research Paper | ScholarLens