1993Unpublished venueRequires access

THE ECONOMIC EFFECTS OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT. PAPER FOR THE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON ENVIRONMENT, TRAFFIC AND URBAN PLANNING, DELFT, JUNE 1993

D A Walmsley, G Gardner

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This paper discusses the organisation and financing of public transport, and the effects of changes in its provision on patronage and urban development. It draws on studies of rapid transit and its effects on public transport and urban development in Western Europe, North America, and various developing countries. Although it concentrates on rapid transit, its general findings should apply, perhaps on a smaller scale, to other improvements in public transport, such as busways. Its discussion of public transport financing considers: (1) funding from revenues; (2) funding from taxation; (3) funding from land value capture; (4) the advantages and disadvantages of assured funding; (5) the involvement of private capital. The most important objective of rapid transit systems - metro and light rail - is to improve public transport, but these systems can also improve the environment and 'image' of a city, change the urban form, and encourage urban development. Their effects on public transport, land use, urban development, and safety are discussed, together with costs and forecasts. Bus deregulation in the UK is also discussed, as an attempt to apply commercial market disciplines to bus operation, and as an indication of how privatisation might affect public transport. Finally, the authors present some conclusions for transport planners in East European countries.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper discusses the organisation and financing of public transport, and the effects of changes in its provision on patronage and urban development. It draws on studies of rapid transit and its effects on public transport and urban development in Western Europe, North America, and various developing countries. Although it concentrates on rapid transit, its general findings should apply, perhaps on a smaller scale, to other improvements in public transport, such as busways. Its discussion of public transport financing considers: (1) funding from revenues; (2) funding from taxation; (3) funding from land value capture; (4) the advantages and disadvantages of assured funding; (5) the involvement of private capital. The most important objective of rapid transit systems - metro and light rail - is to improve public transport, but these systems can also improve the environment and 'image' of a city, change the urban form, and encourage urban development. Their effects on public transport, land use, urban development, and safety are discussed, together with costs and forecasts. Bus deregulation in the UK is also discussed, as an attempt to apply commercial market disciplines to bus operation, and as an indication of how privatisation might affect public transport. Finally, the authors present some conclusions for transport planners in East European countries.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper discusses the organisation and financing of public transport, and the effects of changes in its provision on patronage and urban development. It draws on studies of rapid transit and its effects on public transport and urban development in Western Europe, North America, and various developing countries. Although it concentrates on rapid transit, its general findings should apply, perhaps on a smaller scale, to other improvements in public transport, such as busways. Its discussion of public transport financing considers: (1) funding from revenues; (2) funding from taxation; (3) funding from land value capture; (4) the advantages and disadvantages of assured funding; (5) the involvement of private capital. The most important objective of rapid transit systems - metro and light rail - is to improve public transport, but these systems can also improve the environment and 'image' of a city, change the urban form, and encourage urban development. Their effects on public transport, land use, urban development, and safety are discussed, together with costs and forecasts. Bus deregulation in the UK is also discussed, as an attempt to apply commercial market disciplines to bus operation, and as an indication of how privatisation might affect public transport. Finally, the authors present some conclusions for transport planners in East European countries.

Key concepts: Public transport, Deregulation, Revenue, Business, Urban planning, Private transport, Transportation planning, Transport engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
THE ECONOMIC EFFECTS OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT. PAPER FOR THE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON ENVIRONMENT, TRAFFIC AND URBAN PLANNING, DELFT, JUNE 1993 — Research Paper | ScholarLens