1983•PubMedRequires access

[Creatinine and urine density as reference values in biological monitoring].

A Demaurex, Küng Hl, H Wirz

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Creatinine and density of urine as reference parameters in biological monitoring Since in practice biological monitoring with 24-hour urine samples is not possible, a reference parameter is required. In two different experimental models - for 10 days in 24-hour portions and for 1 day with spontaneous individual fractions - creatinine excretion, mean daily urine volume and urine density were measured quantitatively in 5 healthy human subjects not exposed to chemistry. In the 10-day model, coefficients of variation were: 8.7% for creatinine, 24.9% for mean urine volume and 11.7% for urine density. In the 1-day model, coefficients of variation were: 15.8% for creatinine, 51.0% for mean urine volume and 28.0% for density. This indicates that the results of the second model are considerably more expressive than those of the first. It can be concluded that creatinine is the most suitable reference parameter. Density is less suitable and mean urine volume least suitable.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Creatinine and density of urine as reference parameters in biological monitoring Since in practice biological monitoring with 24-hour urine samples is not possible, a reference parameter is required. In two different experimental models - for 10 days in 24-hour portions and for 1 day with spontaneous individual fractions - creatinine excretion, mean daily urine volume and urine density were measured quantitatively in 5 healthy human subjects not exposed to chemistry. In the 10-day model, coefficients of variation were: 8.7% for creatinine, 24.9% for mean urine volume and 11.7% for urine density. In the 1-day model, coefficients of variation were: 15.8% for creatinine, 51.0% for mean urine volume and 28.0% for density. This indicates that the results of the second model are considerably more expressive than those of the first. It can be concluded that creatinine is the most suitable reference parameter. Density is less suitable and mean urine volume least suitable.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Creatinine and density of urine as reference parameters in biological monitoring Since in practice biological monitoring with 24-hour urine samples is not possible, a reference parameter is required. In two different experimental models - for 10 days in 24-hour portions and for 1 day with spontaneous individual fractions - creatinine excretion, mean daily urine volume and urine density were measured quantitatively in 5 healthy human subjects not exposed to chemistry. In the 10-day model, coefficients of variation were: 8.7% for creatinine, 24.9% for mean urine volume and 11.7% for urine density. In the 1-day model, coefficients of variation were: 15.8% for creatinine, 51.0% for mean urine volume and 28.0% for density. This indicates that the results of the second model are considerably more expressive than those of the first. It can be concluded that creatinine is the most suitable reference parameter. Density is less suitable and mean urine volume least suitable.

Key concepts: Urine, Creatinine, Volume (thermodynamics), Chemistry, Urology, Excretion, Medicine, Thermodynamics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Creatinine and urine density as reference values in biological monitoring]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens