2012PubMedRequires access

Effect of glycemic conrol on periodontal status.

Farzeen Tanwir, Amna Tariq

Open publisher page 12 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between glycemic control and the periodontal status of an urban population with poor oral hygiene. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY: Memon Dental Care Centre and Memon Diabetic and Diagnostic Centre, Karachi, from July to December 2010. METHODOLOGY: One hundred and forty-one individuals with controlled diabetes and 143 with uncontrolled diabetes were recruited from the dental clinic. All underwent clinical examination and grades on plaque index, gingival index, periodontal index and calculus index were recorded and compared. RESULTS: The group with uncontrolled diabetes included 56 males (38.9%) and 88 females (61.1%), and the controlled diabetic group included 49 males (34.8%) and 92 females (65.2%). Periodontal index, gingival index and plaque index showed significant differences in both the groups (p-value < 0.016, < 0.001, < 0.002, respectively) while the difference of calculus was not significant i.e. 0.056. The mean number of teeth present in both the groups was 22. Most of the subjects cleaned their teeth once daily with the help of tooth brush, while the patients brushing twice daily were 16%. CONCLUSION: Uncontrolled diabetes had significantly severe impact on periodontal status in the studied groups with poor oral hygiene; diabetic patients have more number of missing teeth, and more plaque.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between glycemic control and the periodontal status of an urban population with poor oral hygiene. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY: Memon Dental Care Centre and Memon Diabetic and Diagnostic Centre, Karachi, from July to December 2010. METHODOLOGY: One hundred and forty-one individuals with controlled diabetes and 143 with uncontrolled diabetes were recruited from the dental clinic. All underwent clinical examination and grades on plaque index, gingival index, periodontal index and calculus index were recorded and compared. RESULTS: The group with uncontrolled diabetes included 56 males (38.9%) and 88 females (61.1%), and the controlled diabetic group included 49 males (34.8%) and 92 females (65.2%). Periodontal index, gingival index and plaque index showed significant differences in both the groups (p-value < 0.016, < 0.001, < 0.002, respectively) while the difference of calculus was not significant i.e. 0.056. The mean number of teeth present in both the groups was 22. Most of the subjects cleaned their teeth once daily with the help of tooth brush, while the patients brushing twice daily were 16%. CONCLUSION: Uncontrolled diabetes had significantly severe impact on periodontal status in the studied groups with poor oral hygiene; diabetic patients have more number of missing teeth, and more plaque.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between glycemic control and the periodontal status of an urban population with poor oral hygiene. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY: Memon Dental Care Centre and Memon Diabetic and Diagnostic Centre, Karachi, from July to December 2010. METHODOLOGY: One hundred and forty-one individuals with controlled diabetes and 143 with uncontrolled diabetes were recruited from the dental clinic. All underwent clinical examination and grades on plaque index, gingival index, periodontal index and calculus index were recorded and compared. RESULTS: The group with uncontrolled diabetes included 56 males (38.9%) and 88 females (61.1%), and the controlled diabetic group included 49 males (34.8%) and 92 females (65.2%). Periodontal index, gingival index and plaque index showed significant differences in both the groups (p-value < 0.016, < 0.001, < 0.002, respectively) while the difference of calculus was not significant i.e. 0.056. The mean number of teeth present in both the groups was 22. Most of the subjects cleaned their teeth once daily with the help of tooth brush, while the patients brushing twice daily were 16%. CONCLUSION: Uncontrolled diabetes had significantly severe impact on periodontal status in the studied groups with poor oral hygiene; diabetic patients have more number of missing teeth, and more plaque.

Key concepts: Medicine, Oral hygiene, Diabetes mellitus, Dentistry, Glycemic, Dental floss, Population, Calculus (dental)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effect of glycemic conrol on periodontal status. — Research Paper | ScholarLens