2016SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

Efficacy of Toothbrushes with and Without Dental Floss: A Comparative Study

Anjumoni Rabha, SwargaJyoti Das

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

Tooth brushing is considered as ‘gold standard’ in prevention and control of periodontal diseases. Removal of dental plaque by brushing is achieved primarily through the direct contact between the filaments and surfaces of teeth. Many devices, namely powered toothbrush, water pick, dental floss are developed in order to improve the oral hygiene. Many studies claim that powered toothbrush is superior to the manual toothbrush but some studies showed reverse of it. Considering this, a study of 3 months duration was carried out to compare the efficiency of powered and manual toothbrush with and without dental floss in terms of reduction in plaque and sulcular bleeding indices (n=80). The subjects were divided into four groups, comprising of 20 in each: Group I = powered toothbrush, Group II = manual toothbrush, Group III = manual toothbrush with dental floss, Group IV = powered toothbrush with dental floss. Plaque and modified sulcular bleeding indices were considered as clinical parameters and recorded at baseline (day 0) and day 30, 60 and 90 using UNC-15 periodontal probe. The observation showed both the powered and manual toothbrushes reduce plaque and bleeding on probing significantly and efficiency is enhanced with the use of dental floss.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Tooth brushing is considered as ‘gold standard’ in prevention and control of periodontal diseases. Removal of dental plaque by brushing is achieved primarily through the direct contact between the filaments and surfaces of teeth. Many devices, namely powered toothbrush, water pick, dental floss are developed in order to improve the oral hygiene. Many studies claim that powered toothbrush is superior to the manual toothbrush but some studies showed reverse of it. Considering this, a study of 3 months duration was carried out to compare the efficiency of powered and manual toothbrush with and without dental floss in terms of reduction in plaque and sulcular bleeding indices (n=80). The subjects were divided into four groups, comprising of 20 in each: Group I = powered toothbrush, Group II = manual toothbrush, Group III = manual toothbrush with dental floss, Group IV = powered toothbrush with dental floss. Plaque and modified sulcular bleeding indices were considered as clinical parameters and recorded at baseline (day 0) and day 30, 60 and 90 using UNC-15 periodontal probe. The observation showed both the powered and manual toothbrushes reduce plaque and bleeding on probing significantly and efficiency is enhanced with the use of dental floss.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Tooth brushing is considered as ‘gold standard’ in prevention and control of periodontal diseases. Removal of dental plaque by brushing is achieved primarily through the direct contact between the filaments and surfaces of teeth. Many devices, namely powered toothbrush, water pick, dental floss are developed in order to improve the oral hygiene. Many studies claim that powered toothbrush is superior to the manual toothbrush but some studies showed reverse of it. Considering this, a study of 3 months duration was carried out to compare the efficiency of powered and manual toothbrush with and without dental floss in terms of reduction in plaque and sulcular bleeding indices (n=80). The subjects were divided into four groups, comprising of 20 in each: Group I = powered toothbrush, Group II = manual toothbrush, Group III = manual toothbrush with dental floss, Group IV = powered toothbrush with dental floss. Plaque and modified sulcular bleeding indices were considered as clinical parameters and recorded at baseline (day 0) and day 30, 60 and 90 using UNC-15 periodontal probe. The observation showed both the powered and manual toothbrushes reduce plaque and bleeding on probing significantly and efficiency is enhanced with the use of dental floss.

Key concepts: Toothbrush, Dental floss, Dentistry, Medicine, Oral hygiene, Dental plaque, Tooth brushing, Bleeding on probing

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Efficacy of Toothbrushes with and Without Dental Floss: A Comparative Study — Research Paper | ScholarLens