1982Unpublished venueRequires access

THE TRANSIT EXTRABOARD: SOME OPPORTUNITIES FOR COST SAVING

L C MacDorman, J C MacDorman

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

Using a survey sample, it is estimated that there could be a $50 million annual saving for the U.S. transit industry through improved manpower planning and extraboard sizing. While constraints of labor agreements and reluctance of transit operator to work overtime tend to increase manpower requirements it is argued that high costs being incurred should induce management action. Without impairing safety or quality of service, it is claimed that the operators roster can be reduced to a practical or political size, if not the most efficient. Vehicle availability must also be examined, since it is uneconomical to have a staff bigger than the fleet of vehicles ready for service. In collective bargaining, work rules that should come in for special attention are those that restrict overtime work, reductions in force, and use of part-time operations. Absenteeism is the primary factor which influences extraboard size and methods of controlling this situation are described.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Using a survey sample, it is estimated that there could be a $50 million annual saving for the U.S. transit industry through improved manpower planning and extraboard sizing. While constraints of labor agreements and reluctance of transit operator to work overtime tend to increase manpower requirements it is argued that high costs being incurred should induce management action. Without impairing safety or quality of service, it is claimed that the operators roster can be reduced to a practical or political size, if not the most efficient. Vehicle availability must also be examined, since it is uneconomical to have a staff bigger than the fleet of vehicles ready for service. In collective bargaining, work rules that should come in for special attention are those that restrict overtime work, reductions in force, and use of part-time operations. Absenteeism is the primary factor which influences extraboard size and methods of controlling this situation are described.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Using a survey sample, it is estimated that there could be a $50 million annual saving for the U.S. transit industry through improved manpower planning and extraboard sizing. While constraints of labor agreements and reluctance of transit operator to work overtime tend to increase manpower requirements it is argued that high costs being incurred should induce management action. Without impairing safety or quality of service, it is claimed that the operators roster can be reduced to a practical or political size, if not the most efficient. Vehicle availability must also be examined, since it is uneconomical to have a staff bigger than the fleet of vehicles ready for service. In collective bargaining, work rules that should come in for special attention are those that restrict overtime work, reductions in force, and use of part-time operations. Absenteeism is the primary factor which influences extraboard size and methods of controlling this situation are described.

Key concepts: Overtime, Work (physics), Absenteeism, Transit (satellite), Service (business), Quality (philosophy), Business, Reservation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
THE TRANSIT EXTRABOARD: SOME OPPORTUNITIES FOR COST SAVING — Research Paper | ScholarLens