ScholarLens Back to search
2009•Learning Disabilities: a Multidisciplinary JournalRequires access

Caution: Response to Intervention

Beverley H. Johns, James M. Kauffman

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

The authors encourage caution in the implementation of Response to Intervention and dispel the false hopes that Response to Intervention will solve many of education’s challenges. Outlined in this article are the reasons why Response to Intervention cannot be the solution to the identification of students for special education, why it can’t prevent disability, and why it cannot reduce the number of students with disabilities.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The authors encourage caution in the implementation of Response to Intervention and dispel the false hopes that Response to Intervention will solve many of education’s challenges. Outlined in this article are the reasons why Response to Intervention cannot be the solution to the identification of students for special education, why it can’t prevent disability, and why it cannot reduce the number of students with disabilities.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The authors encourage caution in the implementation of Response to Intervention and dispel the false hopes that Response to Intervention will solve many of education’s challenges. Outlined in this article are the reasons why Response to Intervention cannot be the solution to the identification of students for special education, why it can’t prevent disability, and why it cannot reduce the number of students with disabilities.

Key concepts: Response to intervention, Intervention (counseling), Identification (biology), Special education, Psychology, Medical education, Medicine, Mathematics education

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Caution: Response to Intervention — Research Paper | ScholarLens