The Individualized Functional Assessment Process for Young Children with Disabilities
Carole Brown, PATTI SEKLEMIAN
Abstract
Carole Brown, PATTI SEKLEMIAN
Abstract
The Zebley decision, rendered by the Supreme Court on February 22, 1990, substantially expanded the definition of disability in young children by including functional equivalence. The result is a new process for disability determination by the Social Security Administration that includes an individualized functional assessment. The developmental principles undergirding the individualized functional assessment have important implications for (a) policy makers under Part H who set standards for eligibility for early intervention services and (b) practitioners who assess young children. It is the responsibility of the early intervention community to translate these policies into practice and to mold and refine policies as new information about best practice in assessment evolves.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The Zebley decision, rendered by the Supreme Court on February 22, 1990, substantially expanded the definition of disability in young children by including functional equivalence. The result is a new process for disability determination by the Social Security Administration that includes an individualized functional assessment. The developmental principles undergirding the individualized functional assessment have important implications for (a) policy makers under Part H who set standards for eligibility for early intervention services and (b) practitioners who assess young children. It is the responsibility of the early intervention community to translate these policies into practice and to mold and refine policies as new information about best practice in assessment evolves.
Key concepts: Intervention (counseling), Psychology, Set (abstract data type), Process (computing), Best practice, Medical education, Medicine, Psychiatry