2024British journal of surgeryOpen access

71487 - The role of previous implant-based breast reconstruction and radiotherapy for surgical complications in DIEP breast reconstruction

Yihang Liu, Stina Jakobsson, Åsa Edsander-Nord, Anna L.V. Johansson, Helena Sackey, Jana de Boniface, Martin Halle

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract Introduction A deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction can be performed de novo or after a previous implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR). Fibrotic changes and capsule development after IBR may increase challenges in microvascular surgery especially in patients with previous radiotherapy. We aimed to evaluate whether previous IBR is associated with increased surgical complication rates in DIEP breast reconstruction. Method This study included all patients undergoing DIEP flap breast reconstruction at a university hospital 2005-2022. Patients were divided into those with or without previous IBR, and then further into those with or without a history of radiotherapy. Main outcomes were 1) microvascular re-anastomosis during surgery and 2) total or partial flap necrosis within 30 days. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were adjusted for Body Mass Index, smoking status, and age. Result Overall, 516 women had received 577 DIEP flap breast reconstructions. Partial necrosis occurred in 25 (4.3%) cases and total necrosis in 5 (0.9%) cases. Radiotherapy had been received prior to 446 reconstructions (77.3%) and in 213 (36.9%), an IBR had previously been performed. In irradiated patients, re-anastomosis and flap necrosis were significantly more common in those with a IBR (25/170 (14.7%) and 12/170 (7.1%), than those without a previous IBR (20/271 (7.4%) and 9/271 (3.3%); p=0.013 and 0.073, respectively). Discussion Previous IBR increased the risk of perioperative re-anastomosis but not of flap necrosis among previously irradiated patients. Although re-reconstruction using a DIEP flap can thus be considered safe despite previous radiotherapy and IBR, surgeons should acknowledge an increased perioperative complexity.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Introduction A deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction can be performed de novo or after a previous implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR). Fibrotic changes and capsule development after IBR may increase challenges in microvascular surgery especially in patients with previous radiotherapy. We aimed to evaluate whether previous IBR is associated with increased surgical complication rates in DIEP breast reconstruction. Method This study included all patients undergoing DIEP flap breast reconstruction at a university hospital 2005-2022. Patients were divided into those with or without previous IBR, and then further into those with or without a history of radiotherapy. Main outcomes were 1) microvascular re-anastomosis during surgery and 2) total or partial flap necrosis within 30 days. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were adjusted for Body Mass Index, smoking status, and age. Result Overall, 516 women had received 577 DIEP flap breast reconstructions. Partial necrosis occurred in 25 (4.3%) cases and total necrosis in 5 (0.9%) cases. Radiotherapy had been received prior to 446 reconstructions (77.3%) and in 213 (36.9%), an IBR had previously been performed. In irradiated patients, re-anastomosis and flap necrosis were significantly more common in those with a IBR (25/170 (14.7%) and 12/170 (7.1%), than those without a previous IBR (20/271 (7.4%) and 9/271 (3.3%); p=0.013 and 0.073, respectively). Discussion Previous IBR increased the risk of perioperative re-anastomosis but not of flap necrosis among previously irradiated patients. Although re-reconstruction using a DIEP flap can thus be considered safe despite previous radiotherapy and IBR, surgeons should acknowledge an increased perioperative complexity.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Introduction A deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction can be performed de novo or after a previous implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR). Fibrotic changes and capsule development after IBR may increase challenges in microvascular surgery especially in patients with previous radiotherapy. We aimed to evaluate whether previous IBR is associated with increased surgical complication rates in DIEP breast reconstruction. Method This study included all patients undergoing DIEP flap breast reconstruction at a university hospital 2005-2022. Patients were divided into those with or without previous IBR, and then further into those with or without a history of radiotherapy. Main outcomes were 1) microvascular re-anastomosis during surgery and 2) total or partial flap necrosis within 30 days. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were adjusted for Body Mass Index, smoking status, and age. Result Overall, 516 women had received 577 DIEP flap breast reconstructions. Partial necrosis occurred in 25 (4.3%) cases and total necrosis in 5 (0.9%) cases. Radiotherapy had been received prior to 446 reconstructions (77.3%) and in 213 (36.9%), an IBR had previously been performed. In irradiated patients, re-anastomosis and flap necrosis were significantly more common in those with a IBR (25/170 (14.7%) and 12/170 (7.1%), than those without a previous IBR (20/271 (7.4%) and 9/271 (3.3%); p=0.013 and 0.073, respectively). Discussion Previous IBR increased the risk of perioperative re-anastomosis but not of flap necrosis among previously irradiated patients. Although re-reconstruction using a DIEP flap can thus be considered safe despite previous radiotherapy and IBR, surgeons should acknowledge an increased perioperative complexity.

Key concepts: Medicine, DIEP flap, Breast reconstruction, Fat necrosis, Surgery, Radiation therapy, Perioperative, Anastomosis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
71487 - The role of previous implant-based breast reconstruction and radiotherapy for surgical complications in DIEP breast reconstruction — Research Paper | ScholarLens