2006Journal of Reconstructive MicrosurgeryRequires access

Fat Necrosis in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flaps: Review of 202 Cases

Marc Vandevoort, Pieter Vermeulen, Gerd Fabré, Jan Vranckx

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Fat necrosis remains one of the complications after autologous breast reconstruction. The knowledge is limited, because previous studies used vague and diverse definitions, and were based on physical examination only. In this study, 202 deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps for breast reconstruction were evaluated with respect to fat necrosis. The findings on the prevalence of fat necrosis were not only based on a physical examination, but also on ultrasound imaging. Physical examination revealed a palpable mass or focal thickening of the flap in 28 patients (13.8%). Ultrasound examination added another 43 patients (21.2%) with formation of a firm area of scar tissue with a diameter ≥ 5 mm. However, 7.5% of patients underwent a surgical procedure to remove the area of fat necrosis, of which 2% were under general anesthesia and 5.5% were under local anesthesia. For the two findings, under clinical examination and untrasound imaging, the following explanatory variables were checked in logistic regression models: age, smoking, body mass index, timing of the reconstruction, and timing and extent of radiation therapy fields. In contrast to previous studies, none of these variables were statistically significant for the occurrence of fat necrosis. These results also suggested that there is no need for a delayed reconstruction in patients who need post-mastectomy radiation therapy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Fat necrosis remains one of the complications after autologous breast reconstruction. The knowledge is limited, because previous studies used vague and diverse definitions, and were based on physical examination only. In this study, 202 deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps for breast reconstruction were evaluated with respect to fat necrosis. The findings on the prevalence of fat necrosis were not only based on a physical examination, but also on ultrasound imaging. Physical examination revealed a palpable mass or focal thickening of the flap in 28 patients (13.8%). Ultrasound examination added another 43 patients (21.2%) with formation of a firm area of scar tissue with a diameter ≥ 5 mm. However, 7.5% of patients underwent a surgical procedure to remove the area of fat necrosis, of which 2% were under general anesthesia and 5.5% were under local anesthesia. For the two findings, under clinical examination and untrasound imaging, the following explanatory variables were checked in logistic regression models: age, smoking, body mass index, timing of the reconstruction, and timing and extent of radiation therapy fields. In contrast to previous studies, none of these variables were statistically significant for the occurrence of fat necrosis. These results also suggested that there is no need for a delayed reconstruction in patients who need post-mastectomy radiation therapy.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Fat necrosis remains one of the complications after autologous breast reconstruction. The knowledge is limited, because previous studies used vague and diverse definitions, and were based on physical examination only. In this study, 202 deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps for breast reconstruction were evaluated with respect to fat necrosis. The findings on the prevalence of fat necrosis were not only based on a physical examination, but also on ultrasound imaging. Physical examination revealed a palpable mass or focal thickening of the flap in 28 patients (13.8%). Ultrasound examination added another 43 patients (21.2%) with formation of a firm area of scar tissue with a diameter ≥ 5 mm. However, 7.5% of patients underwent a surgical procedure to remove the area of fat necrosis, of which 2% were under general anesthesia and 5.5% were under local anesthesia. For the two findings, under clinical examination and untrasound imaging, the following explanatory variables were checked in logistic regression models: age, smoking, body mass index, timing of the reconstruction, and timing and extent of radiation therapy fields. In contrast to previous studies, none of these variables were statistically significant for the occurrence of fat necrosis. These results also suggested that there is no need for a delayed reconstruction in patients who need post-mastectomy radiation therapy.

Key concepts: Medicine, Fat necrosis, Breast reconstruction, DIEP flap, Perforator flaps, Surgery, Necrosis, Breast cancer

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Fat Necrosis in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flaps: Review of 202 Cases — Research Paper | ScholarLens