Genuine carbene versus carbene‐like reactivity
Jan Lorkowski, Patrick Yorkgitis, Melinda R. Serrato, Milan Gembický, Cezary Pietraszuk, Guy Bertrand, Rodolphe Jazzar
Abstract
Open-access reader
Jan Lorkowski, Patrick Yorkgitis, Melinda R. Serrato, Milan Gembický, Cezary Pietraszuk, Guy Bertrand, Rodolphe Jazzar
Abstract
Open-access reader
Singlet carbenes are not always isolable and often even elude direct detection. When they escape observation, their formation can sometimes be evidenced by in situ trapping experiments. However, is carbene-like reactivity genuine evidence of carbene formation? Herein, using the first example of a spectroscopically characterized cyclic (amino)(aryl)carbene (CAArC), we cast doubt on the most common carbene trapping reactions as sufficient proof of carbene formation.
OpenAlex reports 19 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Singlet carbenes are not always isolable and often even elude direct detection. When they escape observation, their formation can sometimes be evidenced by in situ trapping experiments. However, is carbene-like reactivity genuine evidence of carbene formation? Herein, using the first example of a spectroscopically characterized cyclic (amino)(aryl)carbene (CAArC), we cast doubt on the most common carbene trapping reactions as sufficient proof of carbene formation.
Key concepts: Carbene, Reactivity (psychology), Chemistry, Transition metal carbene complex, Singlet state, Aryl, Photochemistry, Organic chemistry