2024•Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical SciencesOpen access

Effects of Right Ventricular Non-Apical Pacing and Right Ventricular Apical Pacing on Left Ventricular Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Y. Wu, Jie Su, Xinpeng Cong, Luoning Zhu, Q. Y. Jiang

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Early studies suggested that right ventricular apical pacing could have non-beneficial effects on left ventricular function. While right ventricular non-apical pacing may have significantly beneficial effects and could be a good alternative to right ventricular apical pacing is unknown. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to compare the mid and long-term effects of right ventricular non-apical pacing and right ventricular apical pacing on left ventricular function. We conducted randomized controlled trials and retrospective cohort studies on patients with pacemakers to compare right ventricular apical and right ventricular non-apical. We evaluated patient’s left ventricular ejection fraction, 6 min walk test, blood N-terminal pro-brain peptide, or brain natriuretic peptide. The results are expressed as the mean difference of the 95 % confidence interval. A total of 1181 references were included for evaluating the relevance. From this, 10 studies with 1246 patients have fulfilled the inclusion criteria (mean age ranged from 55 y to 85 y; male 62 %; 622 (50 %) right ventricular apical; 624 (50 %) right ventricular non-apical). There was no difference between the right ventricular apical and right ventricular non-apical groups in baseline left ventricular ejection fraction groups (mean difference=0.32, 95 % confidence interval (-0.70, 1.34), p=0.98, random effect model) and postoperative 6 min walking test (mean difference=5.14, 95 % confidence interval (-6.60, 16.89), p=0.51, I2=0 %). In terms of left ventricular ejection fraction index and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide or brain natriuretic peptides, the right ventricular non-apical group was better than the right ventricular apical group (mean difference=-0.74, 95 % confidence interval (-2.24, 0.77), p<0.0001, I2=56 %). Sensitivity analysis and funnel chart showed that our research is robust and has low publication bias. Our results showed that right ventricular non-apical pacing had significant beneficial effects on postoperative left ventricular ejection fraction than right ventricular apical pacing in patients with a pacemaker implanted for more than 1 y.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Early studies suggested that right ventricular apical pacing could have non-beneficial effects on left ventricular function. While right ventricular non-apical pacing may have significantly beneficial effects and could be a good alternative to right ventricular apical pacing is unknown. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to compare the mid and long-term effects of right ventricular non-apical pacing and right ventricular apical pacing on left ventricular function. We conducted randomized controlled trials and retrospective cohort studies on patients with pacemakers to compare right ventricular apical and right ventricular non-apical. We evaluated patient’s left ventricular ejection fraction, 6 min walk test, blood N-terminal pro-brain peptide, or brain natriuretic peptide. The results are expressed as the mean difference of the 95 % confidence interval. A total of 1181 references were included for evaluating the relevance. From this, 10 studies with 1246 patients have fulfilled the inclusion criteria (mean age ranged from 55 y to 85 y; male 62 %; 622 (50 %) right ventricular apical; 624 (50 %) right ventricular non-apical). There was no difference between the right ventricular apical and right ventricular non-apical groups in baseline left ventricular ejection fraction groups (mean difference=0.32, 95 % confidence interval (-0.70, 1.34), p=0.98, random effect model) and postoperative 6 min walking test (mean difference=5.14, 95 % confidence interval (-6.60, 16.89), p=0.51, I2=0 %). In terms of left ventricular ejection fraction index and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide or brain natriuretic peptides, the right ventricular non-apical group was better than the right ventricular apical group (mean difference=-0.74, 95 % confidence interval (-2.24, 0.77), p<0.0001, I2=56 %). Sensitivity analysis and funnel chart showed that our research is robust and has low publication bias. Our results showed that right ventricular non-apical pacing had significant beneficial effects on postoperative left ventricular ejection fraction than right ventricular apical pacing in patients with a pacemaker implanted for more than 1 y.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Early studies suggested that right ventricular apical pacing could have non-beneficial effects on left ventricular function. While right ventricular non-apical pacing may have significantly beneficial effects and could be a good alternative to right ventricular apical pacing is unknown. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to compare the mid and long-term effects of right ventricular non-apical pacing and right ventricular apical pacing on left ventricular function. We conducted randomized controlled trials and retrospective cohort studies on patients with pacemakers to compare right ventricular apical and right ventricular non-apical. We evaluated patient’s left ventricular ejection fraction, 6 min walk test, blood N-terminal pro-brain peptide, or brain natriuretic peptide. The results are expressed as the mean difference of the 95 % confidence interval. A total of 1181 references were included for evaluating the relevance. From this, 10 studies with 1246 patients have fulfilled the inclusion criteria (mean age ranged from 55 y to 85 y; male 62 %; 622 (50 %) right ventricular apical; 624 (50 %) right ventricular non-apical). There was no difference between the right ventricular apical and right ventricular non-apical groups in baseline left ventricular ejection fraction groups (mean difference=0.32, 95 % confidence interval (-0.70, 1.34), p=0.98, random effect model) and postoperative 6 min walking test (mean difference=5.14, 95 % confidence interval (-6.60, 16.89), p=0.51, I2=0 %). In terms of left ventricular ejection fraction index and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide or brain natriuretic peptides, the right ventricular non-apical group was better than the right ventricular apical group (mean difference=-0.74, 95 % confidence interval (-2.24, 0.77), p<0.0001, I2=56 %). Sensitivity analysis and funnel chart showed that our research is robust and has low publication bias. Our results showed that right ventricular non-apical pacing had significant beneficial effects on postoperative left ventricular ejection fraction than right ventricular apical pacing in patients with a pacemaker implanted for more than 1 y.

Key concepts: Ventricular pacing, Ventricular function, Cardiology, Internal medicine, Medicine, Apex (geometry), Heart failure, Anatomy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effects of Right Ventricular Non-Apical Pacing and Right Ventricular Apical Pacing on Left Ventricular Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis — Research Paper | ScholarLens