Effect of blood flow restriction training according to pressure level on lower extremity muscle activity in adult males
Hao Zhu, Seong-No Lee
Abstract
Hao Zhu, Seong-No Lee
Abstract
Low-intensity blood flow restriction training is comparable to traditional high-intensity resistance exercises in increasing muscle strength and size. However, determining the optimal level of restriction pressure for blood flow restriction training has remained a challenging issue. In this study, we enlisted 32 healthy adult men and conducted repeated measurements at one-week intervals to explore this issue. Prior to the experiment, we accurately measured the arterial occlusion pressure (AOP) of participants" lower limbs using a color vascular Doppler ultrasound device. Surface electromyography was then utilized to monitor the impact of blood flow restriction squat training at varying relative restriction pressures (0%, 60%, 70%, 80% AOP) on the muscle activity (RMSMVC%) in lower limb muscles(RF, VMO, VLO, BF, SM, GM). The results showed significant variations in the activity of major lower limb muscles at different levels of restriction pressure (p<.05). Notably, blood flow restriction training at 60% to 80% AOP resulted in significantly greater muscle activation than low-intensity exercise without blood flow restriction (p<.05), indicating that low-intensity squat training with blood flow restriction enhances thigh muscle activation. Additionally, the study found that thigh muscle activity at restriction pressures above 70% AOP was significantly greater compared to 60% AOP (p<.05). However, there was no significant difference in thigh muscle activation between the 70% and 80% AOP levels (p>.05). This suggests that restriction pressures above 70% AOP are most effective in activating thigh muscles, but increasing the pressure beyond 70% AOP does not yield additional significant benefits. Therefore, setting the restriction pressure to 70% AOP during lower limb blood flow restriction training is optimal for maximizing fast-twitch muscle fiber recruitment and enhancing muscle adaptation.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Low-intensity blood flow restriction training is comparable to traditional high-intensity resistance exercises in increasing muscle strength and size. However, determining the optimal level of restriction pressure for blood flow restriction training has remained a challenging issue. In this study, we enlisted 32 healthy adult men and conducted repeated measurements at one-week intervals to explore this issue. Prior to the experiment, we accurately measured the arterial occlusion pressure (AOP) of participants" lower limbs using a color vascular Doppler ultrasound device. Surface electromyography was then utilized to monitor the impact of blood flow restriction squat training at varying relative restriction pressures (0%, 60%, 70%, 80% AOP) on the muscle activity (RMSMVC%) in lower limb muscles(RF, VMO, VLO, BF, SM, GM). The results showed significant variations in the activity of major lower limb muscles at different levels of restriction pressure (p<.05). Notably, blood flow restriction training at 60% to 80% AOP resulted in significantly greater muscle activation than low-intensity exercise without blood flow restriction (p<.05), indicating that low-intensity squat training with blood flow restriction enhances thigh muscle activation. Additionally, the study found that thigh muscle activity at restriction pressures above 70% AOP was significantly greater compared to 60% AOP (p<.05). However, there was no significant difference in thigh muscle activation between the 70% and 80% AOP levels (p>.05). This suggests that restriction pressures above 70% AOP are most effective in activating thigh muscles, but increasing the pressure beyond 70% AOP does not yield additional significant benefits. Therefore, setting the restriction pressure to 70% AOP during lower limb blood flow restriction training is optimal for maximizing fast-twitch muscle fiber recruitment and enhancing muscle adaptation.
Key concepts: Blood flow restriction, Resistance training, Intensity (physics), Blood flow, Blood pressure, Strength training, Medicine, Physical therapy