Muscular adaptations to low-load resistance training to repetition failure with and without blood flow restriction
Christopher Pignanelli
Abstract
Open-access reader
Christopher Pignanelli
Abstract
Open-access reader
Blood flow restriction during resistance exercise is an effective method for increasing muscular size and strength. However, skeletal muscle adaptations to low-load resistance exercise (LL-RE) and low-load blood flow restriction resistance exercise (LL-BFR) performed to repetition failure are lacking. Whole-body and skeletal muscle physiological outcomes were measured following 6-weeks of LL-RE and LL-BFR training to repetition failure using a within-subject design. Similar muscle strength and size outcomes occurred despite lower total exercise volume with LL-BFR. Both groups increased power output during the first-third of an endurance task and only LL-BFR training sustained a greater power output during the midpoint by 18%. Capillary contacts of type I muscle fibers increased similarly for both groups and only LL-RE training increased mitochondrial respiratory capacity by 20%. Overall, differences in muscle fatigue between LL-RE and LL-BFR may exist and are not explained by muscular strength and size or muscle microvascular and mitochondrial properties.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Blood flow restriction during resistance exercise is an effective method for increasing muscular size and strength. However, skeletal muscle adaptations to low-load resistance exercise (LL-RE) and low-load blood flow restriction resistance exercise (LL-BFR) performed to repetition failure are lacking. Whole-body and skeletal muscle physiological outcomes were measured following 6-weeks of LL-RE and LL-BFR training to repetition failure using a within-subject design. Similar muscle strength and size outcomes occurred despite lower total exercise volume with LL-BFR. Both groups increased power output during the first-third of an endurance task and only LL-BFR training sustained a greater power output during the midpoint by 18%. Capillary contacts of type I muscle fibers increased similarly for both groups and only LL-RE training increased mitochondrial respiratory capacity by 20%. Overall, differences in muscle fatigue between LL-RE and LL-BFR may exist and are not explained by muscular strength and size or muscle microvascular and mitochondrial properties.
Key concepts: Blood flow restriction, Resistance training, Repetition (rhetorical device), Resistance (ecology), Training (meteorology), Fluid restriction, Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Psychology