2024Geomechanics and GeoengineeringRequires access

Tunneling problems in weak rock conditions under shallow overburden and comparison between full-face excavation and sequence excavation methods

Ebu Bekir Aygar, Servet Karahan, Candan Gökçeoğlu

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

The T8 tunnel was constructed within the scope of the Ankara – Sivas High-Speed Railway project. The tunnel route is formed completely by very weak and weak lithological units. The overburden decreases to 10 m, and the highest overburden thickness reaches up to 60 m. The tunnel is large with a 150 m2 excavation area and 14 m diameter. During the excavations in the section with an overburden thickness of 12 m, the supports failed, and the tunnel was completely collapsed. The purposes of the present study are to discuss the causes of the failure and engineering measures and to compare NATM and ADECO-RS methods with three-dimensional (3D) numerical analyses. Considering the mechanism of failure, extra engineering measures were proposed and the T8 tunnel was completed successfully. For the purpose of the study, a series of 3D numerical analyses were performed, and the results are discussed. The results obtained from the 3D numerical analyses showed that the ADECO-RS method yielded higher performance than the NATM method, for very weak and weak ground conditions (Category C).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The T8 tunnel was constructed within the scope of the Ankara – Sivas High-Speed Railway project. The tunnel route is formed completely by very weak and weak lithological units. The overburden decreases to 10 m, and the highest overburden thickness reaches up to 60 m. The tunnel is large with a 150 m2 excavation area and 14 m diameter. During the excavations in the section with an overburden thickness of 12 m, the supports failed, and the tunnel was completely collapsed. The purposes of the present study are to discuss the causes of the failure and engineering measures and to compare NATM and ADECO-RS methods with three-dimensional (3D) numerical analyses. Considering the mechanism of failure, extra engineering measures were proposed and the T8 tunnel was completed successfully. For the purpose of the study, a series of 3D numerical analyses were performed, and the results are discussed. The results obtained from the 3D numerical analyses showed that the ADECO-RS method yielded higher performance than the NATM method, for very weak and weak ground conditions (Category C).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The T8 tunnel was constructed within the scope of the Ankara – Sivas High-Speed Railway project. The tunnel route is formed completely by very weak and weak lithological units. The overburden decreases to 10 m, and the highest overburden thickness reaches up to 60 m. The tunnel is large with a 150 m2 excavation area and 14 m diameter. During the excavations in the section with an overburden thickness of 12 m, the supports failed, and the tunnel was completely collapsed. The purposes of the present study are to discuss the causes of the failure and engineering measures and to compare NATM and ADECO-RS methods with three-dimensional (3D) numerical analyses. Considering the mechanism of failure, extra engineering measures were proposed and the T8 tunnel was completed successfully. For the purpose of the study, a series of 3D numerical analyses were performed, and the results are discussed. The results obtained from the 3D numerical analyses showed that the ADECO-RS method yielded higher performance than the NATM method, for very weak and weak ground conditions (Category C).

Key concepts: Overburden, Excavation, New Austrian Tunnelling method, Geotechnical engineering, Geology, Quantum tunnelling, Mining engineering, Materials science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Tunneling problems in weak rock conditions under shallow overburden and comparison between full-face excavation and sequence excavation methods — Research Paper | ScholarLens