The Preservation of Amoraic Argumentation
David Kraemer
Abstract
David Kraemer
Abstract
Abstract The extent to which we understand the amoraim of the middle generations to have distanced themselves from earlier models depends heavily on our view of their involvement in the preservation of argumentation. There is of course no question that they participated in argumentation; there is ample evidence of the fact that they did. But there is also little question that their amoraic predecessors, or the tannaim before them, also participated in argumentation.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract The extent to which we understand the amoraim of the middle generations to have distanced themselves from earlier models depends heavily on our view of their involvement in the preservation of argumentation. There is of course no question that they participated in argumentation; there is ample evidence of the fact that they did. But there is also little question that their amoraic predecessors, or the tannaim before them, also participated in argumentation.
Key concepts: Argumentation theory, Epistemology, Psychology, Philosophy