Feminisms and Argumentation
Catherine Helen Palczewski
Abstract
Catherine Helen Palczewski
Abstract
Feminisms and argumentation intersect around three questions. Is argument inherently patriarchal? If not, then what models of feminist argumentation exist and in what ways do feminist theories inform argumentation analyses? Although feminists are right to critique the masculinist assumptions of most argument styles and forms, argumentation is necessary for productive feminist politics, and feminisms can be productive for the analysis of argumentation.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Feminisms and argumentation intersect around three questions. Is argument inherently patriarchal? If not, then what models of feminist argumentation exist and in what ways do feminist theories inform argumentation analyses? Although feminists are right to critique the masculinist assumptions of most argument styles and forms, argumentation is necessary for productive feminist politics, and feminisms can be productive for the analysis of argumentation.
Key concepts: Argumentation theory, Argument (complex analysis), Epistemology, Politics, Sociology, Gender studies, Political science, Philosophy