2023•Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

The demarcation problem

Michael D. Gordin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The “demarcation problem” is the philosophical challenge to develop a coherent distinction between science and pseudoscience. The problem received its name and its most famous solution from the Austrian-British philosopher, Karl Popper. Popper’s proposal, “falsifiability,” stated that if a doctrine made knowledge claims that could never possibly be proven false, then the theory was no longer scientific but pseudoscientific. This account is especially popular among scientists, even though in terms of logic and empirical adequacy Popper’s account fails. After describing Popper’s theory and its difficulties, the chapter also gives an account of how it became so widely known as a consequence of debates over creationism. In conclusion, some philosophical alternatives to Popper are discussed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The “demarcation problem” is the philosophical challenge to develop a coherent distinction between science and pseudoscience. The problem received its name and its most famous solution from the Austrian-British philosopher, Karl Popper. Popper’s proposal, “falsifiability,” stated that if a doctrine made knowledge claims that could never possibly be proven false, then the theory was no longer scientific but pseudoscientific. This account is especially popular among scientists, even though in terms of logic and empirical adequacy Popper’s account fails. After describing Popper’s theory and its difficulties, the chapter also gives an account of how it became so widely known as a consequence of debates over creationism. In conclusion, some philosophical alternatives to Popper are discussed.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The “demarcation problem” is the philosophical challenge to develop a coherent distinction between science and pseudoscience. The problem received its name and its most famous solution from the Austrian-British philosopher, Karl Popper. Popper’s proposal, “falsifiability,” stated that if a doctrine made knowledge claims that could never possibly be proven false, then the theory was no longer scientific but pseudoscientific. This account is especially popular among scientists, even though in terms of logic and empirical adequacy Popper’s account fails. After describing Popper’s theory and its difficulties, the chapter also gives an account of how it became so widely known as a consequence of debates over creationism. In conclusion, some philosophical alternatives to Popper are discussed.

Key concepts: Pseudoscience, Falsifiability, Karl popper, Epistemology, Doctrine, Philosophy, Critical rationalism, Creationism

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The demarcation problem — Research Paper | ScholarLens