Aesthetic Historicity
Willmar Sauter
Abstract
Open-access reader
Willmar Sauter
Abstract
Open-access reader
The relationship between artefacts and archival sources from the past and actors and audiences of the present is theorised in terms of aesthetic historicity. Illustrated by a workshop at the Drottningholm theatre, the practical experiences are transformed into a theory, which includes arguments by Arendt, Postlewait, Derrida, Wiles, Jameson, and Brecht. The theoretical model takes into consideration the artistic, intellectual, and societal impulses of periods that separate the past from the present. It is also shown how aesthetic historicity can be used as analytical and/or practical tools. Aesthetic Historicity thus represents a theory, a model as well as a method.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The relationship between artefacts and archival sources from the past and actors and audiences of the present is theorised in terms of aesthetic historicity. Illustrated by a workshop at the Drottningholm theatre, the practical experiences are transformed into a theory, which includes arguments by Arendt, Postlewait, Derrida, Wiles, Jameson, and Brecht. The theoretical model takes into consideration the artistic, intellectual, and societal impulses of periods that separate the past from the present. It is also shown how aesthetic historicity can be used as analytical and/or practical tools. Aesthetic Historicity thus represents a theory, a model as well as a method.
Key concepts: Historicity (philosophy), Aesthetics, Epistemology, Philosophy, Sociology, History, Political science, Law