2002BaštinaRequires access

Historicity of topics and methodological device of Atanasije Urošević

Vesna M. Sekulić

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The author strives to establish and present the aspects of historicity in the work of Atanasije Urosevic. The problem of historicity lies in Urosevic's methodology and in the choice of topics. The historicity of his methodological device comes from matching the chosen events according to the chronological axis. Even though Urosevic was ethnologist by his education, his topics are numerous, and it is not easy to conclude which of them is historical. We define what historicity is according to our resources.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The author strives to establish and present the aspects of historicity in the work of Atanasije Urosevic. The problem of historicity lies in Urosevic's methodology and in the choice of topics. The historicity of his methodological device comes from matching the chosen events according to the chronological axis. Even though Urosevic was ethnologist by his education, his topics are numerous, and it is not easy to conclude which of them is historical. We define what historicity is according to our resources.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The author strives to establish and present the aspects of historicity in the work of Atanasije Urosevic. The problem of historicity lies in Urosevic's methodology and in the choice of topics. The historicity of his methodological device comes from matching the chosen events according to the chronological axis. Even though Urosevic was ethnologist by his education, his topics are numerous, and it is not easy to conclude which of them is historical. We define what historicity is according to our resources.

Key concepts: Historicity (philosophy), Epistemology, Matching (statistics), Sociology, Philosophy, Computer science, Mathematics, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Historicity of topics and methodological device of Atanasije Urošević — Research Paper | ScholarLens