Historicity of topics and methodological device of Atanasije Urošević
Vesna M. Sekulić
Abstract
Vesna M. Sekulić
Abstract
The author strives to establish and present the aspects of historicity in the work of Atanasije Urosevic. The problem of historicity lies in Urosevic's methodology and in the choice of topics. The historicity of his methodological device comes from matching the chosen events according to the chronological axis. Even though Urosevic was ethnologist by his education, his topics are numerous, and it is not easy to conclude which of them is historical. We define what historicity is according to our resources.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The author strives to establish and present the aspects of historicity in the work of Atanasije Urosevic. The problem of historicity lies in Urosevic's methodology and in the choice of topics. The historicity of his methodological device comes from matching the chosen events according to the chronological axis. Even though Urosevic was ethnologist by his education, his topics are numerous, and it is not easy to conclude which of them is historical. We define what historicity is according to our resources.
Key concepts: Historicity (philosophy), Epistemology, Matching (statistics), Sociology, Philosophy, Computer science, Mathematics, Political science