2023Engineering Technology & Applied Science ResearchOpen access

Behavior of a Circular Footing resting on Sand Reinforced with Geogrid and Grid Anchors

Rima Helis, Tarek Mansouri, Khelifa Abbèche

Open full text 7 citations

Abstract

This study used finite element analysis to investigate the influence of using two reinforcing systems, the geogrid and the grid anchor, on the bearing capacity of a circular footing resting on sand. The parameters studied were the effect of the number of reinforcement layers (N), the depth ratio of the topmost layer of reinforcement (u/d), the vertical spacing ratio between consecutive layers (h/d), and the effect of reinforcement length (L). The results showed that the reinforcement layout had a very significant effect on the behavior of the reinforced sand foundation. The maximum bearing capacity for single-layer inclusion was obtained when reinforcement was placed at a depth of u/d=0.42. Bearing capacity was also found to improve when increasing the number of reinforcement layers from 1 to 3. Additionally, the analysis showed that the sand reinforced by grid anchors performed better than that reinforced by geogrid. Finally, an improvement in load capacity was obtained by increasing the length of the inclusions, and the optimal length of the reinforcements was determined at 5d for both inclusions.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study used finite element analysis to investigate the influence of using two reinforcing systems, the geogrid and the grid anchor, on the bearing capacity of a circular footing resting on sand. The parameters studied were the effect of the number of reinforcement layers (N), the depth ratio of the topmost layer of reinforcement (u/d), the vertical spacing ratio between consecutive layers (h/d), and the effect of reinforcement length (L). The results showed that the reinforcement layout had a very significant effect on the behavior of the reinforced sand foundation. The maximum bearing capacity for single-layer inclusion was obtained when reinforcement was placed at a depth of u/d=0.42. Bearing capacity was also found to improve when increasing the number of reinforcement layers from 1 to 3. Additionally, the analysis showed that the sand reinforced by grid anchors performed better than that reinforced by geogrid. Finally, an improvement in load capacity was obtained by increasing the length of the inclusions, and the optimal length of the reinforcements was determined at 5d for both inclusions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study used finite element analysis to investigate the influence of using two reinforcing systems, the geogrid and the grid anchor, on the bearing capacity of a circular footing resting on sand. The parameters studied were the effect of the number of reinforcement layers (N), the depth ratio of the topmost layer of reinforcement (u/d), the vertical spacing ratio between consecutive layers (h/d), and the effect of reinforcement length (L). The results showed that the reinforcement layout had a very significant effect on the behavior of the reinforced sand foundation. The maximum bearing capacity for single-layer inclusion was obtained when reinforcement was placed at a depth of u/d=0.42. Bearing capacity was also found to improve when increasing the number of reinforcement layers from 1 to 3. Additionally, the analysis showed that the sand reinforced by grid anchors performed better than that reinforced by geogrid. Finally, an improvement in load capacity was obtained by increasing the length of the inclusions, and the optimal length of the reinforcements was determined at 5d for both inclusions.

Key concepts: Geogrid, Reinforcement, Bearing capacity, Foundation (evidence), Grid, Finite element method, Geotechnical engineering, Materials science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Behavior of a Circular Footing resting on Sand Reinforced with Geogrid and Grid Anchors — Research Paper | ScholarLens