2023•Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Open access

Structure Behaviour under Seismic loads using X-Bracing, Inverted V-Bracing Systems and without Bracing

Amer Yassin, Kabir Sadeghi

Open full text 4 citations

Abstract

This study aims to assess the seismic behaviour of different braced steel frames using nonlinear static analysis. The model consists of 11 stories, designed and analyzed with X-bracing, inverted V-bracing, and without bracing through ETABS. Therefore, the Maximum Story Drift, Stiffness Factor, and Displacement of all these seismic parameters were investigated and compared by implementing the pushover analysis method. The benefit of these parameters helps decide between rebuilding or repairing the affected structure after the earthquake. Even though these parameters are considered approximate methods to predict the displacement and drifts. The results of this study showed that the frames that are supported with Xbracing are more efficient and have the best seismic performance. In addition to that, the investigation was applied by installing braces in mid-span, and two different spans. However, installing braces in two spans has a slight advantage in performance.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study aims to assess the seismic behaviour of different braced steel frames using nonlinear static analysis. The model consists of 11 stories, designed and analyzed with X-bracing, inverted V-bracing, and without bracing through ETABS. Therefore, the Maximum Story Drift, Stiffness Factor, and Displacement of all these seismic parameters were investigated and compared by implementing the pushover analysis method. The benefit of these parameters helps decide between rebuilding or repairing the affected structure after the earthquake. Even though these parameters are considered approximate methods to predict the displacement and drifts. The results of this study showed that the frames that are supported with Xbracing are more efficient and have the best seismic performance. In addition to that, the investigation was applied by installing braces in mid-span, and two different spans. However, installing braces in two spans has a slight advantage in performance.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study aims to assess the seismic behaviour of different braced steel frames using nonlinear static analysis. The model consists of 11 stories, designed and analyzed with X-bracing, inverted V-bracing, and without bracing through ETABS. Therefore, the Maximum Story Drift, Stiffness Factor, and Displacement of all these seismic parameters were investigated and compared by implementing the pushover analysis method. The benefit of these parameters helps decide between rebuilding or repairing the affected structure after the earthquake. Even though these parameters are considered approximate methods to predict the displacement and drifts. The results of this study showed that the frames that are supported with Xbracing are more efficient and have the best seismic performance. In addition to that, the investigation was applied by installing braces in mid-span, and two different spans. However, installing braces in two spans has a slight advantage in performance.

Key concepts: Bracing, Structural engineering, Geology, Geotechnical engineering, Engineering, Brace

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Structure Behaviour under Seismic loads using X-Bracing, Inverted V-Bracing Systems and without Bracing — Research Paper | ScholarLens