2014Applied Mechanics and MaterialsRequires access

Comparative Investigation on the Seismic Performance of a Benchmark Steel Frame with Different Bracing Systems

Jia Hao Huang, Zhen Zhou, Xian Ting He, Lingxuan Li

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Buckling-restrained braces (BRBs) and self-centering buckling-restrained braces (SC-BRBs) have been verified as novel energy dissipation bracing systems. This paper conducted a comparative investigation on the seismic-resisting performance of a Benchmark steel frame with these two types of bracing systems using the finite element analysis software OpenSEES. The analysis demonstrated that, in the equal-strength design principle, the SC-BRB frame results in weaker energy dissipation, bigger story drifts, and more evenly distributed story drifts along the building height compared to BRB frame. The residual deformations of SC-BRB frame under strong earthquakes are significantly smaller than the pure frame as well as BRB frame, but the maximum axial bracing force and floor accelerations are increased significantly for SC-BRB frame.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Buckling-restrained braces (BRBs) and self-centering buckling-restrained braces (SC-BRBs) have been verified as novel energy dissipation bracing systems. This paper conducted a comparative investigation on the seismic-resisting performance of a Benchmark steel frame with these two types of bracing systems using the finite element analysis software OpenSEES. The analysis demonstrated that, in the equal-strength design principle, the SC-BRB frame results in weaker energy dissipation, bigger story drifts, and more evenly distributed story drifts along the building height compared to BRB frame. The residual deformations of SC-BRB frame under strong earthquakes are significantly smaller than the pure frame as well as BRB frame, but the maximum axial bracing force and floor accelerations are increased significantly for SC-BRB frame.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Buckling-restrained braces (BRBs) and self-centering buckling-restrained braces (SC-BRBs) have been verified as novel energy dissipation bracing systems. This paper conducted a comparative investigation on the seismic-resisting performance of a Benchmark steel frame with these two types of bracing systems using the finite element analysis software OpenSEES. The analysis demonstrated that, in the equal-strength design principle, the SC-BRB frame results in weaker energy dissipation, bigger story drifts, and more evenly distributed story drifts along the building height compared to BRB frame. The residual deformations of SC-BRB frame under strong earthquakes are significantly smaller than the pure frame as well as BRB frame, but the maximum axial bracing force and floor accelerations are increased significantly for SC-BRB frame.

Key concepts: Bracing, Structural engineering, OpenSees, Frame (networking), Dissipation, Steel frame, Buckling, Braced frame

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative Investigation on the Seismic Performance of a Benchmark Steel Frame with Different Bracing Systems — Research Paper | ScholarLens