2022Digital Law JournalOpen access

The right to be forgotten: A new human right?

E. S. Chub

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

The article analyzes the need to establish the “right to be forgotten” as a new human right in the context of the correlation with the right to privacy. Its legislative development and global application call into question the relationship between private and public interests. The issue includes protection of an individual’s privacy, on the one hand, and freedom of information and expression on the other. In this context, the purpose of the study is to identify an approach to enshrine the “right to be forgotten” in a way that strikes an optimal balance of interests.Exploring the evolution of the “right to be forgotten” and the problems of its enforcement, as well as its impact on free access to information and freedom of expression, the author examines the current state of this institution. As the “right to be forgotten” originally appeared in the European Union, the article examines legislation and law enforcement practice of the “right to be forgotten” in the Russian Federation and the European Union, which leads to the conclusion that the “right to be forgotten” should be considered as an independent category in the current Russian legislation. It is proposed to supplement item 1 clause 10.3 of Federal Law “On Information, Information Technology and Information Security” with a provision that the operator of a search engine has the right to refuse to satisfy requests to remove references in cases where the information is of public interest.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The article analyzes the need to establish the “right to be forgotten” as a new human right in the context of the correlation with the right to privacy. Its legislative development and global application call into question the relationship between private and public interests. The issue includes protection of an individual’s privacy, on the one hand, and freedom of information and expression on the other. In this context, the purpose of the study is to identify an approach to enshrine the “right to be forgotten” in a way that strikes an optimal balance of interests.Exploring the evolution of the “right to be forgotten” and the problems of its enforcement, as well as its impact on free access to information and freedom of expression, the author examines the current state of this institution. As the “right to be forgotten” originally appeared in the European Union, the article examines legislation and law enforcement practice of the “right to be forgotten” in the Russian Federation and the European Union, which leads to the conclusion that the “right to be forgotten” should be considered as an independent category in the current Russian legislation. It is proposed to supplement item 1 clause 10.3 of Federal Law “On Information, Information Technology and Information Security” with a provision that the operator of a search engine has the right to refuse to satisfy requests to remove references in cases where the information is of public interest.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The article analyzes the need to establish the “right to be forgotten” as a new human right in the context of the correlation with the right to privacy. Its legislative development and global application call into question the relationship between private and public interests. The issue includes protection of an individual’s privacy, on the one hand, and freedom of information and expression on the other. In this context, the purpose of the study is to identify an approach to enshrine the “right to be forgotten” in a way that strikes an optimal balance of interests.Exploring the evolution of the “right to be forgotten” and the problems of its enforcement, as well as its impact on free access to information and freedom of expression, the author examines the current state of this institution. As the “right to be forgotten” originally appeared in the European Union, the article examines legislation and law enforcement practice of the “right to be forgotten” in the Russian Federation and the European Union, which leads to the conclusion that the “right to be forgotten” should be considered as an independent category in the current Russian legislation. It is proposed to supplement item 1 clause 10.3 of Federal Law “On Information, Information Technology and Information Security” with a provision that the operator of a search engine has the right to refuse to satisfy requests to remove references in cases where the information is of public interest.

Key concepts: Right to be forgotten, Legislation, Enforcement, Right to know, Context (archaeology), The Right to Privacy, Legislature, European union

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The right to be forgotten: A new human right? — Research Paper | ScholarLens