2020•Unpublished venueRequires access

Six. Credit Claiming and Blaming

James M. Curry, Frances E. Lee

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

While Congress has not become more partisan in its lawmaking efforts, and while majority parties have not become more effective at enacting their agendas, Americans still perceive contemporary lawmaking as deeply and increasingly partisan. This chapter seeks to understand one possibility why this is the case: that lawmakers' public statements in reaction to successful legislative action create a different impression than that found by looking at roll-call breakdowns and the substance of legislative accomplishments. However, looking at lawmakers' public comments in New York Times and Washington Post articles about legislative successes, this chapter again finds little change over time. Lawmakers today are negative and partisan in their reactions to legislative successes, but no more so than they were in the 1970s. Any perceptions that legislative outcomes are more partisan than in the past must rely on sources other than members quoted in media coverage

About this research paper

What this paper is about

While Congress has not become more partisan in its lawmaking efforts, and while majority parties have not become more effective at enacting their agendas, Americans still perceive contemporary lawmaking as deeply and increasingly partisan. This chapter seeks to understand one possibility why this is the case: that lawmakers' public statements in reaction to successful legislative action create a different impression than that found by looking at roll-call breakdowns and the substance of legislative accomplishments. However, looking at lawmakers' public comments in New York Times and Washington Post articles about legislative successes, this chapter again finds little change over time. Lawmakers today are negative and partisan in their reactions to legislative successes, but no more so than they were in the 1970s. Any perceptions that legislative outcomes are more partisan than in the past must rely on sources other than members quoted in media coverage

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

While Congress has not become more partisan in its lawmaking efforts, and while majority parties have not become more effective at enacting their agendas, Americans still perceive contemporary lawmaking as deeply and increasingly partisan. This chapter seeks to understand one possibility why this is the case: that lawmakers' public statements in reaction to successful legislative action create a different impression than that found by looking at roll-call breakdowns and the substance of legislative accomplishments. However, looking at lawmakers' public comments in New York Times and Washington Post articles about legislative successes, this chapter again finds little change over time. Lawmakers today are negative and partisan in their reactions to legislative successes, but no more so than they were in the 1970s. Any perceptions that legislative outcomes are more partisan than in the past must rely on sources other than members quoted in media coverage

Key concepts: Lawmaking, Legislature, Political science, Action (physics), Law, Law and economics, Public administration, Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Six. Credit Claiming and Blaming — Research Paper | ScholarLens