20222022 21st IEEE Intersociety Conference on Thermal and Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronic Systems (iTherm)Requires access

Microprocessor Performance with Multiple Cooling Approaches

Mark Schultz, Pritish R. Parida, Timothy Chainer

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

The standard cooling approach for medium to high power microprocessor devices remains air cooling. However, increasing power density has driven overall interest in alternative, more efficient methods of cooling microprocessors. In this work we present and compare performance results for three different cooling approaches: air cooling, single-phase liquid cooling and chip-embedded two- phase liquid cooling each applied to the exact same processor devices. The devices were operated over a wide range of frequencies and workload, creating a range of operating powers that varied with the utilized cooling technology. The single- and two-phase liquid cooling approaches provide substantial reductions in system power usage and operating temperatures, with both approaches well-suited to chiller-less facility level implementation. The two-phase cooling approach has the advantage of extendibility to 3D stack cooling at the same level of cooling effectiveness. Overall, the improved thermal performance and efficiency of the described alternatives to air cooling make them prime candidates for implementation in future systems.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The standard cooling approach for medium to high power microprocessor devices remains air cooling. However, increasing power density has driven overall interest in alternative, more efficient methods of cooling microprocessors. In this work we present and compare performance results for three different cooling approaches: air cooling, single-phase liquid cooling and chip-embedded two- phase liquid cooling each applied to the exact same processor devices. The devices were operated over a wide range of frequencies and workload, creating a range of operating powers that varied with the utilized cooling technology. The single- and two-phase liquid cooling approaches provide substantial reductions in system power usage and operating temperatures, with both approaches well-suited to chiller-less facility level implementation. The two-phase cooling approach has the advantage of extendibility to 3D stack cooling at the same level of cooling effectiveness. Overall, the improved thermal performance and efficiency of the described alternatives to air cooling make them prime candidates for implementation in future systems.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The standard cooling approach for medium to high power microprocessor devices remains air cooling. However, increasing power density has driven overall interest in alternative, more efficient methods of cooling microprocessors. In this work we present and compare performance results for three different cooling approaches: air cooling, single-phase liquid cooling and chip-embedded two- phase liquid cooling each applied to the exact same processor devices. The devices were operated over a wide range of frequencies and workload, creating a range of operating powers that varied with the utilized cooling technology. The single- and two-phase liquid cooling approaches provide substantial reductions in system power usage and operating temperatures, with both approaches well-suited to chiller-less facility level implementation. The two-phase cooling approach has the advantage of extendibility to 3D stack cooling at the same level of cooling effectiveness. Overall, the improved thermal performance and efficiency of the described alternatives to air cooling make them prime candidates for implementation in future systems.

Key concepts: Computer cooling, Chiller, Microprocessor, Air cooling, Active cooling, Water cooling, Computer science, Passive cooling

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Microprocessor Performance with Multiple Cooling Approaches — Research Paper | ScholarLens