2022Unpublished venueRequires access

Energy Consumption Comparison of Current Powertrain Options in Autonomous Heavy Duty Vehicles (HDV)

Sebastian Sigle, Robert Hahn

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

This paper shows a simulative comparison of battery electric vehicle (BEV), fuel cell electric vehicle (FCEV) and internal combustion engine vehicle (ICEV) powertrains for heavy-duty commercial vehicles. Furthermore, these powertrains will be developed as a cabin model and as an autonomous vehicle model. A commercial vehicle cycle is selected, which can be divided into urban, regional and highway subareas. From this, a daily cycle is created, which consists of these subareas. The different parameters of each simulation model consist of vehicle masses, auxiliary loads and vehicle resistances. In the final results, an improvement in energy consumption of an autonomously driving, electrified powertrain compared to a cab model in the regional and highway area of up to 5.5% is possible. The powertrain comparison shows the greatest energy savings potential for electrified powertrains in urban areas.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper shows a simulative comparison of battery electric vehicle (BEV), fuel cell electric vehicle (FCEV) and internal combustion engine vehicle (ICEV) powertrains for heavy-duty commercial vehicles. Furthermore, these powertrains will be developed as a cabin model and as an autonomous vehicle model. A commercial vehicle cycle is selected, which can be divided into urban, regional and highway subareas. From this, a daily cycle is created, which consists of these subareas. The different parameters of each simulation model consist of vehicle masses, auxiliary loads and vehicle resistances. In the final results, an improvement in energy consumption of an autonomously driving, electrified powertrain compared to a cab model in the regional and highway area of up to 5.5% is possible. The powertrain comparison shows the greatest energy savings potential for electrified powertrains in urban areas.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper shows a simulative comparison of battery electric vehicle (BEV), fuel cell electric vehicle (FCEV) and internal combustion engine vehicle (ICEV) powertrains for heavy-duty commercial vehicles. Furthermore, these powertrains will be developed as a cabin model and as an autonomous vehicle model. A commercial vehicle cycle is selected, which can be divided into urban, regional and highway subareas. From this, a daily cycle is created, which consists of these subareas. The different parameters of each simulation model consist of vehicle masses, auxiliary loads and vehicle resistances. In the final results, an improvement in energy consumption of an autonomously driving, electrified powertrain compared to a cab model in the regional and highway area of up to 5.5% is possible. The powertrain comparison shows the greatest energy savings potential for electrified powertrains in urban areas.

Key concepts: Powertrain, Automotive engineering, Heavy duty, Battery electric vehicle, Driving cycle, Electric vehicle, Battery (electricity), Energy consumption

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Energy Consumption Comparison of Current Powertrain Options in Autonomous Heavy Duty Vehicles (HDV) — Research Paper | ScholarLens