2022Unpublished venueRequires access

A Wittgensteinian Account of Free Will and Moral Responsibility

Stefan Rummens, Benjamin De Mesel

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

In this chapter we deal with the challenge to the existence of free will and moral responsibility that is raised by the threat of determinism, drawing upon a Wittgensteinian perspective. Our argument starts by briefly recapitulating Wittgenstein&s;s analysis of the practice of doubt in On Certainty . We subsequently turn to the problem of free will. We argue that the existence of free will is a basic certainty and that the thesis of determinism fails to cast doubt on it. We thereby make use of – but also try to go beyond – Wittgenstein&s;s own remarks in his “Lectures on Freedom of the Will”. In the final section we focus more explicitly on moral responsibility. Inspired by P. F. Strawson&s;s work on free will and moral responsibility, which we take to be deeply Wittgensteinian, we argue that our practices of holding each other responsible manifest basic human certainties which cannot be meaningfully challenged by invoking the thesis of determinism.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this chapter we deal with the challenge to the existence of free will and moral responsibility that is raised by the threat of determinism, drawing upon a Wittgensteinian perspective. Our argument starts by briefly recapitulating Wittgenstein&s;s analysis of the practice of doubt in On Certainty . We subsequently turn to the problem of free will. We argue that the existence of free will is a basic certainty and that the thesis of determinism fails to cast doubt on it. We thereby make use of – but also try to go beyond – Wittgenstein&s;s own remarks in his “Lectures on Freedom of the Will”. In the final section we focus more explicitly on moral responsibility. Inspired by P. F. Strawson&s;s work on free will and moral responsibility, which we take to be deeply Wittgensteinian, we argue that our practices of holding each other responsible manifest basic human certainties which cannot be meaningfully challenged by invoking the thesis of determinism.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this chapter we deal with the challenge to the existence of free will and moral responsibility that is raised by the threat of determinism, drawing upon a Wittgensteinian perspective. Our argument starts by briefly recapitulating Wittgenstein&s;s analysis of the practice of doubt in On Certainty . We subsequently turn to the problem of free will. We argue that the existence of free will is a basic certainty and that the thesis of determinism fails to cast doubt on it. We thereby make use of – but also try to go beyond – Wittgenstein&s;s own remarks in his “Lectures on Freedom of the Will”. In the final section we focus more explicitly on moral responsibility. Inspired by P. F. Strawson&s;s work on free will and moral responsibility, which we take to be deeply Wittgensteinian, we argue that our practices of holding each other responsible manifest basic human certainties which cannot be meaningfully challenged by invoking the thesis of determinism.

Key concepts: Philosophy, Moral responsibility, Free will, Epistemology, Law and economics, Environmental ethics, Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Wittgensteinian Account of Free Will and Moral Responsibility — Research Paper | ScholarLens