2022Urology Research and PracticeOpen access

Artificial Urinary Sphincter in a High-Risk Urethra: Transcorporal Gullwing Modification Description of the Technique

David Hernández-Hernández, María Yanira Ortega-González, Bárbara Padilla‐Fernández, David Castro‐Díaz

Open full text 4 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In this report, we describe a modification of transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter place ment known as Gullwing modification. DESCRIPTION OF TECHNIQUE: Using a penoscrotal approach, bilateral corpora cavernosa flaps are harvested and sutured in the midline covering the lateral and ventral surfaces of the urethra. Transcorporal cuff placement provides dorsal reinforcement, thus having extra tissue buttressing all the circumference in cases of a fragile urethra due to previous urethral cuff erosion, urethroplasty, or pelvic radiotherapy. PATIENT AND METHODS: After previous urethral cuff erosion, radiotherapy, and urethral reconstruction, our patient complained of severe stress urinary incontinence. Due to the high risk of urethral complications, we proceed to a transcorporal artificial sphincter placement with urethral reinforcement through a bilateral cavernosal flap. RESULTS: The surgery was successfully completed, and after 6 weeks, sphincter was activated with satisfac tory results. Two years after surgery, his continence status is stable without complications. CONCLUSION: Urethral complications associated with artificial urinary sphincter surgery remain a challenge for the reconstructive surgeon. Reinforcement of the ventral aspect of the urethra through corpora cavernosal flaps may reduce the likelihood of urethral erosion in high-risk cases.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: In this report, we describe a modification of transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter place ment known as Gullwing modification. DESCRIPTION OF TECHNIQUE: Using a penoscrotal approach, bilateral corpora cavernosa flaps are harvested and sutured in the midline covering the lateral and ventral surfaces of the urethra. Transcorporal cuff placement provides dorsal reinforcement, thus having extra tissue buttressing all the circumference in cases of a fragile urethra due to previous urethral cuff erosion, urethroplasty, or pelvic radiotherapy. PATIENT AND METHODS: After previous urethral cuff erosion, radiotherapy, and urethral reconstruction, our patient complained of severe stress urinary incontinence. Due to the high risk of urethral complications, we proceed to a transcorporal artificial sphincter placement with urethral reinforcement through a bilateral cavernosal flap. RESULTS: The surgery was successfully completed, and after 6 weeks, sphincter was activated with satisfac tory results. Two years after surgery, his continence status is stable without complications. CONCLUSION: Urethral complications associated with artificial urinary sphincter surgery remain a challenge for the reconstructive surgeon. Reinforcement of the ventral aspect of the urethra through corpora cavernosal flaps may reduce the likelihood of urethral erosion in high-risk cases.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: In this report, we describe a modification of transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter place ment known as Gullwing modification. DESCRIPTION OF TECHNIQUE: Using a penoscrotal approach, bilateral corpora cavernosa flaps are harvested and sutured in the midline covering the lateral and ventral surfaces of the urethra. Transcorporal cuff placement provides dorsal reinforcement, thus having extra tissue buttressing all the circumference in cases of a fragile urethra due to previous urethral cuff erosion, urethroplasty, or pelvic radiotherapy. PATIENT AND METHODS: After previous urethral cuff erosion, radiotherapy, and urethral reconstruction, our patient complained of severe stress urinary incontinence. Due to the high risk of urethral complications, we proceed to a transcorporal artificial sphincter placement with urethral reinforcement through a bilateral cavernosal flap. RESULTS: The surgery was successfully completed, and after 6 weeks, sphincter was activated with satisfac tory results. Two years after surgery, his continence status is stable without complications. CONCLUSION: Urethral complications associated with artificial urinary sphincter surgery remain a challenge for the reconstructive surgeon. Reinforcement of the ventral aspect of the urethra through corpora cavernosal flaps may reduce the likelihood of urethral erosion in high-risk cases.

Key concepts: Artificial urinary sphincter, Urethra, Medicine, Cuff, Urethral sphincter, Surgery, Urinary incontinence, Sphincter

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Artificial Urinary Sphincter in a High-Risk Urethra: Transcorporal Gullwing Modification Description of the Technique — Research Paper | ScholarLens