MANAGEMENT OF CUFF EROSION OF THE DOUBLE CUFF ARTIFICIAL URINARY SPHINCTER
BRADLEY B. BELL, John J. Mulcahy
Abstract
BRADLEY B. BELL, John J. Mulcahy
Abstract
PURPOSE: We report on a series of patients with erosion of 1 cuff of an AMS800 double cuff artificial urinary sphincter and determine the success rate of removing the eroded cuff, leaving the other components behind and converting the device to a single cuff system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 9 patients with a double cuff artificial sphincter 1 eroded cuff was removed and the system was converted to a single cuff sphincter. RESULTS: Followup was based on an incontinence scoring system. In 1 patient the remaining cuff was removed because it also eroded. In another patient a wound infection developed 5 months after placement and the entire device was removed. The remaining 7 patients had better continence scores than before artificial sphincter placement but each remarked that continence was better with 2 cuffs. CONCLUSIONS: An eroded cuff of a double cuff artificial urinary sphincter system can be successfully removed and the device can be converted to a single cuff system.
OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
PURPOSE: We report on a series of patients with erosion of 1 cuff of an AMS800 double cuff artificial urinary sphincter and determine the success rate of removing the eroded cuff, leaving the other components behind and converting the device to a single cuff system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 9 patients with a double cuff artificial sphincter 1 eroded cuff was removed and the system was converted to a single cuff sphincter. RESULTS: Followup was based on an incontinence scoring system. In 1 patient the remaining cuff was removed because it also eroded. In another patient a wound infection developed 5 months after placement and the entire device was removed. The remaining 7 patients had better continence scores than before artificial sphincter placement but each remarked that continence was better with 2 cuffs. CONCLUSIONS: An eroded cuff of a double cuff artificial urinary sphincter system can be successfully removed and the device can be converted to a single cuff system.
Key concepts: Cuff, Artificial urinary sphincter, Medicine, Surgery, Sphincter, Urinary incontinence, Urethral sphincter, Urinary system