1987Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research BoardRequires access

ACCURACY AND TOLERANCES OF WEIGH-IN-MOTION SYSTEMS

Bahman Izadmehr, Clyde E Lee

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

A systematic study of in-motion weighing of some 800 trucks that were selected from the traffic stream on I-10 near Seguin, Texas, yielded data sets that were analyzed to define the attainable accuracy within which wheel, axle, axle-group, and gross vehicle weights could be estimated by a properly calibrated in-pavement weigh-in-motion system. Each truck that was weighed passed successively over the Radian weigh-in-motion system transducers at high (plus or minus 50 mph), intermediate (plus or minus 30 mph), and low (less than or equal to 10 mph) speed and then stopped on a special axle/wheel reference scale for successive static weighing of each wheel. Tolerances for a 95 percent confidence level were derived after the system had been calibrated to yield a zero mean of differences in the weigh-in-motion wheel weight estimates and the corresponding static wheel weights. The concept of use tolerances, which allow for the probable error in both the static wieight measurement and the weigh-in-motion weight estimate, is presented. Tolerances for high-speed weigh-in-motion, intermediate-speed weigh-in-motion, and low-speed weigh-in-motion scales at the experimental site are tabulated.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A systematic study of in-motion weighing of some 800 trucks that were selected from the traffic stream on I-10 near Seguin, Texas, yielded data sets that were analyzed to define the attainable accuracy within which wheel, axle, axle-group, and gross vehicle weights could be estimated by a properly calibrated in-pavement weigh-in-motion system. Each truck that was weighed passed successively over the Radian weigh-in-motion system transducers at high (plus or minus 50 mph), intermediate (plus or minus 30 mph), and low (less than or equal to 10 mph) speed and then stopped on a special axle/wheel reference scale for successive static weighing of each wheel. Tolerances for a 95 percent confidence level were derived after the system had been calibrated to yield a zero mean of differences in the weigh-in-motion wheel weight estimates and the corresponding static wheel weights. The concept of use tolerances, which allow for the probable error in both the static wieight measurement and the weigh-in-motion weight estimate, is presented. Tolerances for high-speed weigh-in-motion, intermediate-speed weigh-in-motion, and low-speed weigh-in-motion scales at the experimental site are tabulated.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A systematic study of in-motion weighing of some 800 trucks that were selected from the traffic stream on I-10 near Seguin, Texas, yielded data sets that were analyzed to define the attainable accuracy within which wheel, axle, axle-group, and gross vehicle weights could be estimated by a properly calibrated in-pavement weigh-in-motion system. Each truck that was weighed passed successively over the Radian weigh-in-motion system transducers at high (plus or minus 50 mph), intermediate (plus or minus 30 mph), and low (less than or equal to 10 mph) speed and then stopped on a special axle/wheel reference scale for successive static weighing of each wheel. Tolerances for a 95 percent confidence level were derived after the system had been calibrated to yield a zero mean of differences in the weigh-in-motion wheel weight estimates and the corresponding static wheel weights. The concept of use tolerances, which allow for the probable error in both the static wieight measurement and the weigh-in-motion weight estimate, is presented. Tolerances for high-speed weigh-in-motion, intermediate-speed weigh-in-motion, and low-speed weigh-in-motion scales at the experimental site are tabulated.

Key concepts: Weigh in motion, Axle, Truck, Motion (physics), Engineering, Automotive engineering, Simulation, Mathematics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
ACCURACY AND TOLERANCES OF WEIGH-IN-MOTION SYSTEMS — Research Paper | ScholarLens