ON-SITE CALIBRATION OF WEIGH-IN-MOTION SYSTEMS
Bahman Izadmehr, Clyde E Lee
Abstract
Bahman Izadmehr, Clyde E Lee
Abstract
The importance of on-site calibration for weigh-in-motion systems has been illustrated by comparing weigh-in-motion weight estimates, made after calibrating the system by three different calibration-loading patterns, against corresponding wheel weights measured on a special static reference scale. Various truck types selected from the traffic on I-10 near Seguin, Texas, were included in the analysis and high, intermediate, and low speeds of in-motion weighing were considered. A pronounced improvement in the accuracy with which weights were estimated by the high and intermediate systems was achieved when six loaded five-axle tractor-trailer trucks, chosen randomly from the traffic stream, were used as the basis for calibration compared with multiple runs of the same loaded two-axle, single-unit test truck. The variability in weigh-in-motion weight estimates was not affected appreciably by the type of moving vehicle loading that was used as the basis for calibration. Static-weight loading is recommended for low speeds of weigh-in-motion calibration, and moving-vehicle loading is recommended for practicable on-site calibration of higher-speed weigh-in-motion systems. Suggestions are offered on the types of trucks and the minimum number of wheel loads that should be used as the basis for on-site calibration.
OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The importance of on-site calibration for weigh-in-motion systems has been illustrated by comparing weigh-in-motion weight estimates, made after calibrating the system by three different calibration-loading patterns, against corresponding wheel weights measured on a special static reference scale. Various truck types selected from the traffic on I-10 near Seguin, Texas, were included in the analysis and high, intermediate, and low speeds of in-motion weighing were considered. A pronounced improvement in the accuracy with which weights were estimated by the high and intermediate systems was achieved when six loaded five-axle tractor-trailer trucks, chosen randomly from the traffic stream, were used as the basis for calibration compared with multiple runs of the same loaded two-axle, single-unit test truck. The variability in weigh-in-motion weight estimates was not affected appreciably by the type of moving vehicle loading that was used as the basis for calibration. Static-weight loading is recommended for low speeds of weigh-in-motion calibration, and moving-vehicle loading is recommended for practicable on-site calibration of higher-speed weigh-in-motion systems. Suggestions are offered on the types of trucks and the minimum number of wheel loads that should be used as the basis for on-site calibration.
Key concepts: Weigh in motion, Truck, Calibration, Axle, Trailer, Tractor, Motion (physics), Simulation