1997PubMedRequires access

New EEOC guidance seen as helpful, but not decisive.

Author information unavailable

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) concluded that a person who applies for disability benefits does not forfeit his rights to claim employment discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Judges are not obligated to follow the EEOC opinion and are likely to continue to dismiss ADA claims if patients said they were disabled when applying for benefits. To be eligible for Social Security benefits, a person must claim to be unable to work. To be a qualified individual with a disability under the ADA, the person must be able to work with or without reasonable accommodation. The EEOC states that an application for benefits is not necessarily inconsistent with a claim that a person is a qualified individual with a disability under the ADA because the statute's standards are fundamentally different from those of disability benefits programs. Because of these differences, courts should not summarily dismiss ADA claims, but should instead conduct individual analyses.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) concluded that a person who applies for disability benefits does not forfeit his rights to claim employment discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Judges are not obligated to follow the EEOC opinion and are likely to continue to dismiss ADA claims if patients said they were disabled when applying for benefits. To be eligible for Social Security benefits, a person must claim to be unable to work. To be a qualified individual with a disability under the ADA, the person must be able to work with or without reasonable accommodation. The EEOC states that an application for benefits is not necessarily inconsistent with a claim that a person is a qualified individual with a disability under the ADA because the statute's standards are fundamentally different from those of disability benefits programs. Because of these differences, courts should not summarily dismiss ADA claims, but should instead conduct individual analyses.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) concluded that a person who applies for disability benefits does not forfeit his rights to claim employment discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Judges are not obligated to follow the EEOC opinion and are likely to continue to dismiss ADA claims if patients said they were disabled when applying for benefits. To be eligible for Social Security benefits, a person must claim to be unable to work. To be a qualified individual with a disability under the ADA, the person must be able to work with or without reasonable accommodation. The EEOC states that an application for benefits is not necessarily inconsistent with a claim that a person is a qualified individual with a disability under the ADA because the statute's standards are fundamentally different from those of disability benefits programs. Because of these differences, courts should not summarily dismiss ADA claims, but should instead conduct individual analyses.

Key concepts: Equal employment opportunity, Reasonable accommodation, Disability benefits, Statute, Commission, Employment discrimination, Social security, Accommodation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
New EEOC guidance seen as helpful, but not decisive. — Research Paper | ScholarLens