Teaching Psychometrics: The Importance of Validity in Assessment Design
Emily L. Coderre
Abstract
Emily L. Coderre
Abstract
Psychometrics is the field of designing tests and assessments to measure certain psychological concepts. It is chiefly concerned with two fundamental properties: reliability and validity. These properties are often influenced by confounding variables: other things that can influence performance but are not what you are trying to measure. Here, I describe how teaching an undergraduate course on psychometrics has reframed my views of assessments in teaching. The goal of any assessment is to accurately, or validly, measure students’ knowledge and learning. This raises three questions that can influence assessment design, course structure, and teaching style: 1) Do deadlines really matter? 2) Should all assessments be offered multiple times? 3) How much do my assessments really measure student knowledge on this topic? In discussing each of these, I consider the ways in which evaluating how validity plays a role in our assessment design and teaching style can help us minimize confounding variables and ensure that students’ grades reflect their learning.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Psychometrics is the field of designing tests and assessments to measure certain psychological concepts. It is chiefly concerned with two fundamental properties: reliability and validity. These properties are often influenced by confounding variables: other things that can influence performance but are not what you are trying to measure. Here, I describe how teaching an undergraduate course on psychometrics has reframed my views of assessments in teaching. The goal of any assessment is to accurately, or validly, measure students’ knowledge and learning. This raises three questions that can influence assessment design, course structure, and teaching style: 1) Do deadlines really matter? 2) Should all assessments be offered multiple times? 3) How much do my assessments really measure student knowledge on this topic? In discussing each of these, I consider the ways in which evaluating how validity plays a role in our assessment design and teaching style can help us minimize confounding variables and ensure that students’ grades reflect their learning.
Key concepts: Psychometrics, Test validity, Psychology, Measure (data warehouse), Validity, Educational assessment, Reliability (semiconductor), Educational measurement