2022Veterinary SurgeryRequires access

Evaluation of a customized 3D ‐printed saw guide for tibial plateau leveling osteotomy: An ex vivo study

Seungeon Lee, Jinsu Kang, Namsoo Kim, Suyoung Heo

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a tibial plateau leveling osteotomy (TPLO) performed with a customized 3D-printed guide and jig is more accurate than the traditional technique using a jig alone. STUDY DESIGN: In vitro study. SAMPLE POPULATION: Cadaveric canine pelvic limbs (n = 10) and 20 synthetic bone models. METHODS: Tibial plateau leveling osteotomy using a jig with (n = 10) and without (n = 10) a customized 3D-printed guide were performed in bone models, and TPLO using a jig with (n = 5) and without (n = 5) a customized 3D-printed guide were performed in cadaveric limbs. Angulation of the osteotomy, angulation of the proximal jig pin, angular/torsional deformity and medial cortex damage were measured from photographs of the specimens and compared. RESULTS: In the bone models, there were differences with and without the 3D guide for mean osteotomy inclination (-0.06° vs. -1.74°, P < .001), osteotomy torsion (5268 vs. 10 469 visible osteotomy pixels, P < .001), and medial cortical damage (2970 vs. 18 562 pixels, P < .001). In the cadaveric study, osteotomy inclination (-1.1° vs. 1.01°, P < .01), induced angular deformity (0.17° vs. -3.01°, P < .001) and angulation of the proximal jig pin (-0.27° vs. 0.80°, P < .001) differed between groups. CONCLUSION: The 3D-printed guide during TPLO resulted in slightly more accurate osteotomies and proximal jig pin placement, and reduced medial cortex damage. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: A customized 3D-printed guide may improve intraoperative accuracy for TPLO, although the clinical significance of the small benefits is unknown.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a tibial plateau leveling osteotomy (TPLO) performed with a customized 3D-printed guide and jig is more accurate than the traditional technique using a jig alone. STUDY DESIGN: In vitro study. SAMPLE POPULATION: Cadaveric canine pelvic limbs (n = 10) and 20 synthetic bone models. METHODS: Tibial plateau leveling osteotomy using a jig with (n = 10) and without (n = 10) a customized 3D-printed guide were performed in bone models, and TPLO using a jig with (n = 5) and without (n = 5) a customized 3D-printed guide were performed in cadaveric limbs. Angulation of the osteotomy, angulation of the proximal jig pin, angular/torsional deformity and medial cortex damage were measured from photographs of the specimens and compared. RESULTS: In the bone models, there were differences with and without the 3D guide for mean osteotomy inclination (-0.06° vs. -1.74°, P < .001), osteotomy torsion (5268 vs. 10 469 visible osteotomy pixels, P < .001), and medial cortical damage (2970 vs. 18 562 pixels, P < .001). In the cadaveric study, osteotomy inclination (-1.1° vs. 1.01°, P < .01), induced angular deformity (0.17° vs. -3.01°, P < .001) and angulation of the proximal jig pin (-0.27° vs. 0.80°, P < .001) differed between groups. CONCLUSION: The 3D-printed guide during TPLO resulted in slightly more accurate osteotomies and proximal jig pin placement, and reduced medial cortex damage. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: A customized 3D-printed guide may improve intraoperative accuracy for TPLO, although the clinical significance of the small benefits is unknown.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a tibial plateau leveling osteotomy (TPLO) performed with a customized 3D-printed guide and jig is more accurate than the traditional technique using a jig alone. STUDY DESIGN: In vitro study. SAMPLE POPULATION: Cadaveric canine pelvic limbs (n = 10) and 20 synthetic bone models. METHODS: Tibial plateau leveling osteotomy using a jig with (n = 10) and without (n = 10) a customized 3D-printed guide were performed in bone models, and TPLO using a jig with (n = 5) and without (n = 5) a customized 3D-printed guide were performed in cadaveric limbs. Angulation of the osteotomy, angulation of the proximal jig pin, angular/torsional deformity and medial cortex damage were measured from photographs of the specimens and compared. RESULTS: In the bone models, there were differences with and without the 3D guide for mean osteotomy inclination (-0.06° vs. -1.74°, P < .001), osteotomy torsion (5268 vs. 10 469 visible osteotomy pixels, P < .001), and medial cortical damage (2970 vs. 18 562 pixels, P < .001). In the cadaveric study, osteotomy inclination (-1.1° vs. 1.01°, P < .01), induced angular deformity (0.17° vs. -3.01°, P < .001) and angulation of the proximal jig pin (-0.27° vs. 0.80°, P < .001) differed between groups. CONCLUSION: The 3D-printed guide during TPLO resulted in slightly more accurate osteotomies and proximal jig pin placement, and reduced medial cortex damage. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: A customized 3D-printed guide may improve intraoperative accuracy for TPLO, although the clinical significance of the small benefits is unknown.

Key concepts: Cadaveric spasm, Osteotomy, Medicine, 3d printed, Deformity, Orthodontics, Biomedical engineering, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of a customized 3D ‐printed saw guide for tibial plateau leveling osteotomy: An ex vivo study — Research Paper | ScholarLens