2018Hip InternationalRequires access

Feasibility of 3D-printed models of the proximal femur to real bone: a cadaveric study

Andrea Sallent, Roberto Seijas, Albert Pérez‐Bellmunt, Eulalia Oliva, Oriol Casasayas-Cos, Carles Escalona‐Marfil, Óscar Ares

Open publisher page 11 citations

Abstract

Introduction: 3D technology has increased popularity during the past decade due to recent advancements and has been described as a useful tool in several fields of medicine including orthopaedic surgery. Applications include preoperative planning, custom-made implants, patient-specific guides, etc. The aim of this study was to evaluate the similarity between 3D-printed models and cadaveric femoral heads, based on CT scans. Methods: Cadaveric study of 12 male hips. Computed tomography (CT) was performed and through a semi-automatic segmentation process created the 3D model. Using a 3D printer, the model was printed in ABS plastic. 1 observer performed several measurements in the cadaver, and a 2nd observer performed the same measurements in the 3D-printed model. A 3rd observer compared both measurements and performed the statistical analysis. Results: There were no significant differences in the measurements of bony structures between the cadaveric specimens and the 3D-printed model ( p > 0.05 in all cases). We found significant differences when comparing measurements containing a soft tissue element, for example the dimensions of the cartilage covered femoral head ( p < 0.0001). Conclusions: 3D-printed models of the hip are accurate and feasible to the real bone and can thus be reliable for preoperative planning or other uses that may arise in orthopaedic surgery. Presence of cartilage must be considered when creating the 3D model from CT that considers bone but not cartilage.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Introduction: 3D technology has increased popularity during the past decade due to recent advancements and has been described as a useful tool in several fields of medicine including orthopaedic surgery. Applications include preoperative planning, custom-made implants, patient-specific guides, etc. The aim of this study was to evaluate the similarity between 3D-printed models and cadaveric femoral heads, based on CT scans. Methods: Cadaveric study of 12 male hips. Computed tomography (CT) was performed and through a semi-automatic segmentation process created the 3D model. Using a 3D printer, the model was printed in ABS plastic. 1 observer performed several measurements in the cadaver, and a 2nd observer performed the same measurements in the 3D-printed model. A 3rd observer compared both measurements and performed the statistical analysis. Results: There were no significant differences in the measurements of bony structures between the cadaveric specimens and the 3D-printed model ( p > 0.05 in all cases). We found significant differences when comparing measurements containing a soft tissue element, for example the dimensions of the cartilage covered femoral head ( p < 0.0001). Conclusions: 3D-printed models of the hip are accurate and feasible to the real bone and can thus be reliable for preoperative planning or other uses that may arise in orthopaedic surgery. Presence of cartilage must be considered when creating the 3D model from CT that considers bone but not cartilage.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Introduction: 3D technology has increased popularity during the past decade due to recent advancements and has been described as a useful tool in several fields of medicine including orthopaedic surgery. Applications include preoperative planning, custom-made implants, patient-specific guides, etc. The aim of this study was to evaluate the similarity between 3D-printed models and cadaveric femoral heads, based on CT scans. Methods: Cadaveric study of 12 male hips. Computed tomography (CT) was performed and through a semi-automatic segmentation process created the 3D model. Using a 3D printer, the model was printed in ABS plastic. 1 observer performed several measurements in the cadaver, and a 2nd observer performed the same measurements in the 3D-printed model. A 3rd observer compared both measurements and performed the statistical analysis. Results: There were no significant differences in the measurements of bony structures between the cadaveric specimens and the 3D-printed model ( p > 0.05 in all cases). We found significant differences when comparing measurements containing a soft tissue element, for example the dimensions of the cartilage covered femoral head ( p < 0.0001). Conclusions: 3D-printed models of the hip are accurate and feasible to the real bone and can thus be reliable for preoperative planning or other uses that may arise in orthopaedic surgery. Presence of cartilage must be considered when creating the 3D model from CT that considers bone but not cartilage.

Key concepts: Cadaveric spasm, 3d printed, Medicine, Cadaver, Femur, Orthodontics, Surgery, Biomedical engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Feasibility of 3D-printed models of the proximal femur to real bone: a cadaveric study — Research Paper | ScholarLens