2014Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooksRequires access

Reflective Practitioner

Linda Lawrence-Wilkes, Lyn Ashmore

Open publisher page 22 citations

Abstract

A survey based on conceptual reflective practice models explored perceptions of the reflective practitioner role and evaluated the scope of teaching practitioners’ engagement in reflective practice. Were reflective activities critical or mechanical? Findings supported aspects of inclusive reflective teaching practice, components for a critical curriculum. However, a tendency towards a mechanistic approach to criticality related to research and subject pedagogy could undermine curriculum development. Findings suggested a need to move beyond instrumental reflection, with implications for teacher training and further recommending the need to make intellectual space to develop pedagogic processes for contextualised critical reflection and praxis for inclusive teaching and learning as key attributes of the reflective practitioner.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A survey based on conceptual reflective practice models explored perceptions of the reflective practitioner role and evaluated the scope of teaching practitioners’ engagement in reflective practice. Were reflective activities critical or mechanical? Findings supported aspects of inclusive reflective teaching practice, components for a critical curriculum. However, a tendency towards a mechanistic approach to criticality related to research and subject pedagogy could undermine curriculum development. Findings suggested a need to move beyond instrumental reflection, with implications for teacher training and further recommending the need to make intellectual space to develop pedagogic processes for contextualised critical reflection and praxis for inclusive teaching and learning as key attributes of the reflective practitioner.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 22 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A survey based on conceptual reflective practice models explored perceptions of the reflective practitioner role and evaluated the scope of teaching practitioners’ engagement in reflective practice. Were reflective activities critical or mechanical? Findings supported aspects of inclusive reflective teaching practice, components for a critical curriculum. However, a tendency towards a mechanistic approach to criticality related to research and subject pedagogy could undermine curriculum development. Findings suggested a need to move beyond instrumental reflection, with implications for teacher training and further recommending the need to make intellectual space to develop pedagogic processes for contextualised critical reflection and praxis for inclusive teaching and learning as key attributes of the reflective practitioner.

Key concepts: Reflective practice, Praxis, Critical reflection, Curriculum, Reflection (computer programming), Pedagogy, Scope (computer science), Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Reflective Practitioner — Research Paper | ScholarLens