1982JAMARequires access

Untitled research work

Peter L. Sosnow

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

To the Editor.— Recent studies1-3have suggested that aminosalicylic acid may be as effective as sulfasalazine in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. These findings are promising and suggest a new avenue for drug design. Aminosalicylic acid and sulfapyridine are metabolites of sulfasalazine that are liberated in the colon by bacterial action. Most toxic effects of sulfasalazine appear related to either the parent compound, or even more likely, the sulfapyridine metabolite.4Therefore, it would be desirable to use aminosalicylic acid alone. Toxic effects would be reduced, and the drug might be used in higher doses, allowing even greater therapeutic efficacy. However, when aminosalicylic acid is administered orally, most of the drug is absorbed in the proximal intestine and eventually excreted in urine.5The drug, therefore, may not reach the colon in the manner made possible by oral administration of sulfasalazine. The studies cited previously in fact used

About this research paper

What this paper is about

To the Editor.— Recent studies1-3have suggested that aminosalicylic acid may be as effective as sulfasalazine in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. These findings are promising and suggest a new avenue for drug design. Aminosalicylic acid and sulfapyridine are metabolites of sulfasalazine that are liberated in the colon by bacterial action. Most toxic effects of sulfasalazine appear related to either the parent compound, or even more likely, the sulfapyridine metabolite.4Therefore, it would be desirable to use aminosalicylic acid alone. Toxic effects would be reduced, and the drug might be used in higher doses, allowing even greater therapeutic efficacy. However, when aminosalicylic acid is administered orally, most of the drug is absorbed in the proximal intestine and eventually excreted in urine.5The drug, therefore, may not reach the colon in the manner made possible by oral administration of sulfasalazine. The studies cited previously in fact used

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

To the Editor.— Recent studies1-3have suggested that aminosalicylic acid may be as effective as sulfasalazine in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. These findings are promising and suggest a new avenue for drug design. Aminosalicylic acid and sulfapyridine are metabolites of sulfasalazine that are liberated in the colon by bacterial action. Most toxic effects of sulfasalazine appear related to either the parent compound, or even more likely, the sulfapyridine metabolite.4Therefore, it would be desirable to use aminosalicylic acid alone. Toxic effects would be reduced, and the drug might be used in higher doses, allowing even greater therapeutic efficacy. However, when aminosalicylic acid is administered orally, most of the drug is absorbed in the proximal intestine and eventually excreted in urine.5The drug, therefore, may not reach the colon in the manner made possible by oral administration of sulfasalazine. The studies cited previously in fact used

Key concepts: Sulfapyridine, Sulfasalazine, Medicine, Aminosalicylic acid, Drug, Pharmacology, Metabolite, Oral administration

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Untitled research work — Research Paper | ScholarLens