1996Archives of Insect Biochemistry and PhysiologyRequires access

Differences in the midgut proteolytic activity of two Heliothis virescens strains, one susceptible and one resistant to Bacillus thuringiensis toxins

Carmen Forcada, Encarna Alcácer, María Dolores Garcerá, Rafael Martı́nez

Open publisher page 11 citations

Abstract

The development of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis toxic proteins is a growing concern because it could threaten both conventional and gene transfer use of this environmentally safe biological insecticide. The most common mechanism of resistance involves changes in binding affinity of toxin receptors in the insect midgut membrane. This has not been the case in Heliothis virescens. We have investigated changes in midgut proteolytic activity as a possibility to explain the resistance observed in this insect species. We have developed an improvement of known methods to demonstrate proteolytic activity in crude extracts. Using this method we have found differences in the proteolytic activity profile of midgut extracts of a susceptible and a resistant H. virescens strain. We also have studied the in vitro processing of CrylA(b) toxin and protoxin by midgut contents of both strains. SDS-PAGE of the in vitro degradation products showed differences between the strains. The resistant strain degrades protoxin more slowly and processes the active toxin more quickly than the susceptible strain. © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The development of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis toxic proteins is a growing concern because it could threaten both conventional and gene transfer use of this environmentally safe biological insecticide. The most common mechanism of resistance involves changes in binding affinity of toxin receptors in the insect midgut membrane. This has not been the case in Heliothis virescens. We have investigated changes in midgut proteolytic activity as a possibility to explain the resistance observed in this insect species. We have developed an improvement of known methods to demonstrate proteolytic activity in crude extracts. Using this method we have found differences in the proteolytic activity profile of midgut extracts of a susceptible and a resistant H. virescens strain. We also have studied the in vitro processing of CrylA(b) toxin and protoxin by midgut contents of both strains. SDS-PAGE of the in vitro degradation products showed differences between the strains. The resistant strain degrades protoxin more slowly and processes the active toxin more quickly than the susceptible strain. © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The development of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis toxic proteins is a growing concern because it could threaten both conventional and gene transfer use of this environmentally safe biological insecticide. The most common mechanism of resistance involves changes in binding affinity of toxin receptors in the insect midgut membrane. This has not been the case in Heliothis virescens. We have investigated changes in midgut proteolytic activity as a possibility to explain the resistance observed in this insect species. We have developed an improvement of known methods to demonstrate proteolytic activity in crude extracts. Using this method we have found differences in the proteolytic activity profile of midgut extracts of a susceptible and a resistant H. virescens strain. We also have studied the in vitro processing of CrylA(b) toxin and protoxin by midgut contents of both strains. SDS-PAGE of the in vitro degradation products showed differences between the strains. The resistant strain degrades protoxin more slowly and processes the active toxin more quickly than the susceptible strain. © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Key concepts: Heliothis virescens, Biology, Bacillus thuringiensis, Midgut, Heliothis, Microbiology, Noctuidae, Lepidoptera genitalia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Differences in the midgut proteolytic activity of two Heliothis virescens strains, one susceptible and one resistant to Bacillus thuringiensis toxins — Research Paper | ScholarLens