2003Unpublished venueRequires access

Considering processing cost in network simulations

Ramaswamy Ramaswamy, Ning Weng, Tilman Wolf

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

In many network simulations and models the cost of processing a packet is considered negligible or overly simplified. The functionality of routers is steadily increasing and complex processing of packet payloads is being implemented (deep packet classification, encryption, content transcoding). We show two examples where processing cost can contribute to a significant portion of the overall packet delay. To enable a more precise consideration of processing delay, we present a tool called NPEST (Network Processing Estimator). NPEST is a framework on top of which packet processing functionality can be implemented and simulated using an actual processor simulator. NPEST can be programmed in C and greatly simplifies the implementation and simulation process as compared to using network processor simulators. The results derived from NPEST can either be used directly or be aggregated to processing statistics for network simulations. We present such results for two prototype applications: IP forwarding and IP security. We also show a comparison between the results obtained from NPEST and an Intel IXP1200 network processor.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In many network simulations and models the cost of processing a packet is considered negligible or overly simplified. The functionality of routers is steadily increasing and complex processing of packet payloads is being implemented (deep packet classification, encryption, content transcoding). We show two examples where processing cost can contribute to a significant portion of the overall packet delay. To enable a more precise consideration of processing delay, we present a tool called NPEST (Network Processing Estimator). NPEST is a framework on top of which packet processing functionality can be implemented and simulated using an actual processor simulator. NPEST can be programmed in C and greatly simplifies the implementation and simulation process as compared to using network processor simulators. The results derived from NPEST can either be used directly or be aggregated to processing statistics for network simulations. We present such results for two prototype applications: IP forwarding and IP security. We also show a comparison between the results obtained from NPEST and an Intel IXP1200 network processor.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In many network simulations and models the cost of processing a packet is considered negligible or overly simplified. The functionality of routers is steadily increasing and complex processing of packet payloads is being implemented (deep packet classification, encryption, content transcoding). We show two examples where processing cost can contribute to a significant portion of the overall packet delay. To enable a more precise consideration of processing delay, we present a tool called NPEST (Network Processing Estimator). NPEST is a framework on top of which packet processing functionality can be implemented and simulated using an actual processor simulator. NPEST can be programmed in C and greatly simplifies the implementation and simulation process as compared to using network processor simulators. The results derived from NPEST can either be used directly or be aggregated to processing statistics for network simulations. We present such results for two prototype applications: IP forwarding and IP security. We also show a comparison between the results obtained from NPEST and an Intel IXP1200 network processor.

Key concepts: Packet processing, Computer science, Processing delay, Network processor, Network packet, Network delay, Deep packet inspection, Packet analyzer

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Considering processing cost in network simulations — Research Paper | ScholarLens