2003Acta PaediatricaRequires access

Simultaneous voiding cystourethrography and voiding urosonography reveals utility of sonographic diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux in children

M Nakamura, T Shinozaki, N Taniguchi, Harumi Koibuchi, M Momoi, K Itoh

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the diagnostic potential of voiding urosonography (VUS) compared with fluoroscopic voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) under identical conditions and to evaluate potential reasons for false-negative VUS results, particularly regarding bladder concentrations of the US contrast agent, Levovist. Methods: Fifty-six paediatric patients (M/F 34/22, mean age 2.3 y, age range 1 mo-14 y) underwent simultaneous VUS and VCUG under identical conditions. The bladder was filled by simultaneous administration of Levovist and the X-ray contrast medium, DIP Conray. Levovist concentrations in bladders were calculated using amounts of Levovist injected and total DIP Conray infused when reflux was first observed in either procedure. Results: Sensitivities of VUS and VCUG for detection of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) were both 86%, assuming that VUR detected by either method represented a true-positive, and no reflux by either method represented a true-negative. Patients under 24-mo of age displayed a better VUS sensitivity, of 94%. Levovist concentrations in bladders ranged from 1.8% to 23%, with older children tending to demonstrate increased bladder capacity and lower concentration. All VUS false-negative units displayed Levovist bladder concentrations of less than 5%. Conclusion: The present simultaneous study suggests that: 1) the two techniques demonstrate similar sensitivity for detection of reflux; 2) sustained Levovist bladder concentrations of below 5% may not allow detection of reflux on VUS; and 3) VUS represents a suitable technique, particularly for small children whose bladder capacity is not so large.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Aim: To evaluate the diagnostic potential of voiding urosonography (VUS) compared with fluoroscopic voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) under identical conditions and to evaluate potential reasons for false-negative VUS results, particularly regarding bladder concentrations of the US contrast agent, Levovist. Methods: Fifty-six paediatric patients (M/F 34/22, mean age 2.3 y, age range 1 mo-14 y) underwent simultaneous VUS and VCUG under identical conditions. The bladder was filled by simultaneous administration of Levovist and the X-ray contrast medium, DIP Conray. Levovist concentrations in bladders were calculated using amounts of Levovist injected and total DIP Conray infused when reflux was first observed in either procedure. Results: Sensitivities of VUS and VCUG for detection of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) were both 86%, assuming that VUR detected by either method represented a true-positive, and no reflux by either method represented a true-negative. Patients under 24-mo of age displayed a better VUS sensitivity, of 94%. Levovist concentrations in bladders ranged from 1.8% to 23%, with older children tending to demonstrate increased bladder capacity and lower concentration. All VUS false-negative units displayed Levovist bladder concentrations of less than 5%. Conclusion: The present simultaneous study suggests that: 1) the two techniques demonstrate similar sensitivity for detection of reflux; 2) sustained Levovist bladder concentrations of below 5% may not allow detection of reflux on VUS; and 3) VUS represents a suitable technique, particularly for small children whose bladder capacity is not so large.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Aim: To evaluate the diagnostic potential of voiding urosonography (VUS) compared with fluoroscopic voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) under identical conditions and to evaluate potential reasons for false-negative VUS results, particularly regarding bladder concentrations of the US contrast agent, Levovist. Methods: Fifty-six paediatric patients (M/F 34/22, mean age 2.3 y, age range 1 mo-14 y) underwent simultaneous VUS and VCUG under identical conditions. The bladder was filled by simultaneous administration of Levovist and the X-ray contrast medium, DIP Conray. Levovist concentrations in bladders were calculated using amounts of Levovist injected and total DIP Conray infused when reflux was first observed in either procedure. Results: Sensitivities of VUS and VCUG for detection of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) were both 86%, assuming that VUR detected by either method represented a true-positive, and no reflux by either method represented a true-negative. Patients under 24-mo of age displayed a better VUS sensitivity, of 94%. Levovist concentrations in bladders ranged from 1.8% to 23%, with older children tending to demonstrate increased bladder capacity and lower concentration. All VUS false-negative units displayed Levovist bladder concentrations of less than 5%. Conclusion: The present simultaneous study suggests that: 1) the two techniques demonstrate similar sensitivity for detection of reflux; 2) sustained Levovist bladder concentrations of below 5% may not allow detection of reflux on VUS; and 3) VUS represents a suitable technique, particularly for small children whose bladder capacity is not so large.

Key concepts: Medicine, Vesicoureteral reflux, Cystourethrography, Reflux, Urology, Radiology, Contrast (vision), Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Simultaneous voiding cystourethrography and voiding urosonography reveals utility of sonographic diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux in children — Research Paper | ScholarLens