1994American Educational Research JournalRequires access

Assessment for Measurement or Standards: The Peril and Promise of Large-Scale Assessment Reform

Catherine Taylor

Open publisher page 12 citations

Abstract

The current call for performance-based assessments is, in part, a consequence of inappropriate uses of norm-referenced achievement tests. Still, the use of performance-based assessment will not automatically eliminate the negative consequences of high-stakes tests, nor support hoped-for changes in schools. School reform will be supported only if new assessment systems are developed using a model that is in harmony with the goals of reform. This article reviews two models for assessment, the measurement model and the standards model, their underlying assumptions about learners, and the resulting implications for performance-based test development. It briefly reviews the current testing debate, defines terms such as authentic assessments and performance-based assessments, and discusses the compromises that have led to the failed attempts to use testing to set standards for education. Finally, the article reflects on the power each assessment model can have on reform efforts.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The current call for performance-based assessments is, in part, a consequence of inappropriate uses of norm-referenced achievement tests. Still, the use of performance-based assessment will not automatically eliminate the negative consequences of high-stakes tests, nor support hoped-for changes in schools. School reform will be supported only if new assessment systems are developed using a model that is in harmony with the goals of reform. This article reviews two models for assessment, the measurement model and the standards model, their underlying assumptions about learners, and the resulting implications for performance-based test development. It briefly reviews the current testing debate, defines terms such as authentic assessments and performance-based assessments, and discusses the compromises that have led to the failed attempts to use testing to set standards for education. Finally, the article reflects on the power each assessment model can have on reform efforts.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The current call for performance-based assessments is, in part, a consequence of inappropriate uses of norm-referenced achievement tests. Still, the use of performance-based assessment will not automatically eliminate the negative consequences of high-stakes tests, nor support hoped-for changes in schools. School reform will be supported only if new assessment systems are developed using a model that is in harmony with the goals of reform. This article reviews two models for assessment, the measurement model and the standards model, their underlying assumptions about learners, and the resulting implications for performance-based test development. It briefly reviews the current testing debate, defines terms such as authentic assessments and performance-based assessments, and discusses the compromises that have led to the failed attempts to use testing to set standards for education. Finally, the article reflects on the power each assessment model can have on reform efforts.

Key concepts: Standards-based assessment, Educational assessment, Standardized test, Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing, Test (biology), Alternative assessment, Norm-referenced test, Criterion-referenced test

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Assessment for Measurement or Standards: The Peril and Promise of Large-Scale Assessment Reform — Research Paper | ScholarLens